Jump to content
North Side Baseball

gflore34

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    10,072
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by gflore34

  1. I'm OK with this, the Bears are out of the playoffs, believe they know what they have in Mooney, remainder of the season is about seeing what they have or do not have in Jones, Jr., Harry, Claypool and Pringle. Did not mention St. Brown or Pettis because they'll be ex-Bears on Black Monday or shortly thereafter. Hope it's nothing career threatening or something that'll pour into next season.
  2. Definitely number 2. We need help everywhere and the ability to have a top 3 pick when we don't need a QB in a year with high profile top of the draft QBs is an absolute blessing we have to take advantage of. Would be fantastic to get an elite stud like Anderson but seems more valuable to be in a situation where you get an extra mid round pick this year and then get 2 first round picks each of the next 2 years. I dont know if I could see Lovie passing on Anderson and if the Texans did take him #1, I would be all in on #2. You could still get a quality OT or DT at 12-20. But, if Anderson is there, I dont see how you dont take him. From what I've read Anderson may a talent in the mode of an Arnold, I would think the Bears will not pass on him. Most especially if the OL is addressed in FA.
  3. Or a 2 year window of rebuild so he doesn't have to hit on all these picks/FA's, which seems nearly impossible. Someone isn't going to perform even though the college resume is solid or the FA acquisition makes sense. Was thinking about the upcoming offseason, while the Bears appear to have a bounty of resources to drastically change/improve their roster it's not idiot proof. This is the facet I'm concerned about; there's a possibility Poles may still horsefeathers it up. I'm not expecting every highly drafted player or FA signing to work however, I am expecting marked improvement on both sides of the ball along with beating the Packers.
  4. Was kicking around a thought that maybe the Bears could trade 2 with maybe a 3rd or 4th rounder (not sure what the actual value chart would say) for the Lions picks (say they end up at 6 and 11) picking one of Carter, Anderson, Murphy, or whichever top OT you like at 6 then trading down from 11 for a late 1 and recoup that other pick sent to Detroit plus more and grab a WR late 1. Smith-Njigba, I 'm generally not a fan of taking players who missed most of the season due to injury however, I believe he'll be available on Day 2. Would love to see the Bears grab him if he's still on the board.
  5. Him and Trico both, Trico going with some nonsense about Love taking over for an injured Rodgers. Much like Rodgers did for an injured Farve against Dallas.
  6. Hate to say it but he looks good. Yeah, the same kind of good that Mitch used to look like in essentially garbage time. I'll take my chances on GB's run of franchise QB's being over once Rodgers becomes an ex-Packer.
  7. Ha, ha, suck Collingsworth world's biggest Packer fan and #1 Rodgers sycophant.
  8. In all seriousness do the horsefeathering Packers ever get called for holding? Sure as horsefeathers never get called for it vs. the Bears.
  9. Rodgers should have never thrown that ball, Fields throws that and were reading/hearing about he can't process NFL defenses, eyes to slow all that garbage.
  10. I want the Bears to bury the horsefeathers to but, this Bears team isn't capable of stopping a college football team let alone a professional football team. No reason whatsoever to play him in what's going to be a feel good, look better game for the Packers.
  11. They were hitting from outside, it'll be interesting to see if they can handle a faster team, like say, an Illinois, when those perimeter shots are not falling. Guys like Shannon and Melendez will be laying the ball up before Edey makes it past half court. Illinois and Indiana are probably not good match ups for the Boilermakers, Michigan and Wisconsin are better match ups for them. Looking good thus far against Duke.
  12. they also have 2 super bowl wins in the last 23 years True enough, the Bears are in far better position for the future though.
  13. As crappy as it is watching these Bears making flotsam and jetsam QB's like Marriota and White look competent, it could be worse. Could be tanking and be the Rams, at least, the Bears have the facilities to overhaul their roster with a lot of quality players. Rams do not have a 1st rounder until 2024, saw their projected cap space at about 6.85 million, in other words not much to work with.
  14. Maybe it's because they're playing a terrible Bears team, there's nothing all that impressive about the Jets. There's a good chance Vikings put a 30-spot on them next week.
  15. Not that it matters but, that was a massive hold on Sandborn, he was tackled.
  16. Could be. Looked bad. Feel bad for Eddie Jackson however, we all know he probably was not going to be part of the next good Bears team. Unfortunately, gets the process started a little early for him.
  17. Any team with some resemblance of a professional defense would have had at least on pick already. Jets with a good defense and all but, not the OB nor the offense to survive and advance in the playoffs. If I were a Jets fan, I wouldn't take too much from this game, it's a false positive.
  18. No, they had some dude last season who appeared not to know that you're supposed to cover receivers. Forgot his name but, far worse than Vildor.
  19. White is terrible, wouldn't be all that surprising if he throws an INT at some point.
  20. Guess they HAD to call a blatantly obvious PI there, color me shocked.
  21. I'm convinced NFL officiating is in on the Bears tank, there are 31 other teams were that's an automatic PI call.
  22. Top 2, I'm more optimistic about other teams overpaying for a QB. If that happens (unless Carter or Anderson is on the board), I take best offensive player available (Johnson) or OT. If the Bears draft 3-5, I'm likely going BPA unless some team makes a great offer I could see this - address D with FA, trade down go offense - happening, appears to be the best approach and the fastest towards building a competitive team.
  23. Fairly certain Illini will take care of business vs. Northwestern do not know about Purdue. Purdue is more than capable of losing to Indiana, I'm torn. On one hand it would be great if the Illini end up winning the West on the other hand, don't really want to watch them lose to Michigan again. I'm certain the Illini will manage to hang in and then get fucked over with some BS officiating. Better they go to a decent bowl while Purdue loses by 30+ to Michigan.
  24. I appreciate the work but wow I hope he’s wrong. That would be a major bummer of an offseason. It's probably not as far off as we'd like, look at last off season all the smoke and noise around Carlos Correa. Who did they end up with? Andrelton Simmons - all of the above acquisitions are in the same mode. That is mediocre to bad players on the cheap. Well, I guess Abreu does not fall into the category of mediocre to bad, he's the outlier, the remainder of them certainly qualify.
  25. If there ever was a game to get well and look good for Wilson it certainly would be against this Bears defense. Must be a move not to lose the locker room for, I'm certain Wilson was geeked about facing the Bears, what QB wouldn't be?
×
×
  • Create New...