Jump to content
North Side Baseball

CubinNY

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    27,784
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    24

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by CubinNY

  1. And they broke the fuckting universe by winning, and here we are dealing with the horsefeathers. They need to restore the universe by winning again and then not again until after I'm dead.
  2. It's the 1% mentality always to want more and better. Not necessarily the Bears, because they do actually need a new venue. But the White Sox? Their park is fine. Most of the other new stadiums are being built for the upper corporate market with boxes and luxury perks, just like the NBA and MLB. Very little is done to enhance the typical fan's experience. It's just money changing hands from one 1%er to another, funded by the taxpayers.
  3. I’m not sure if you think the post is disgusting or the Ricketts are disgusting. But their candidate funding is a matter of public record. As is Papa Joe’s history, aka, the real money behind kids.
  4. It's not a nefarious plot; it's their pattern. I think the Ricketts/Jed are content to offer what they believe is a fair value contract moving forward with an eye to what they think is going to happen after the lockout. I think they believed that if they signed Bregman, he'd not a Cub after 2026.
  5. They were 6 million less on Scott. The Dodgers also gave him $20 million up front and $20 million deferred. They were 10 million less on Bergman, AAV, and gave him an opt-out after 2026. The Red Sox gave him an opt-out and paid him $10 million more. Can we say they were serious? From a conceptual standpoint, I suppose.
  6. You're arguing a position not taken. The fact that they signed Swanson in no way negates the pattern of their behavior. And I don't necessarily think they will let Tucker walk without a significant play for him.
  7. The Ricketts are using the Cubs to finance Wrigleyville and Nazis.
  8. I'm not following this point at all. Given how little money is guaranteed beyond 2026, suggests it's a pattern. The goal is to be in a better bargaining position for free agents/extensions post-strike/lockout. You are talking about a guy/family who, with a straight face, said, "We just want to break even every year".
  9. It's time to start the separation. At this time, good teams tend to step on the gas, so to speak, and put the mediocre and bad teams in the rearview mirror. Lodolo is a good pitcher so this will be a test.
  10. I think you are wish-casting. They know his agent. They have a very good idea of his value. I think they will make a "fair" offer and try to get creative or whatever on the accounting. But if LA, NYY, or NYM want him, that's where he will play. I am entirely convinced the Ricketts are looking to win the upcoming labor dispute in 2027. They don't want to have a lot of contracts because they will be in a better negotiating position after the strike is over.
  11. They will have a number. The number will be their number. And that's it. If he can get more, he will be gone. Will it be a "competitive number"? Probably. But if we know one thing about them, it's that they don't move once they think they've maxed out. Jed doesn't seem to mind the AAV, but he minds the years. He echoes the Ricketts sentiment of not wanting to get into bad contracts over many years. They will only sign guys to "fair" or "team-friendly" deals. They won't sign a player if they know he'll be worth significantly less than they pay for two or three years. It's not their DNA. They don't seem to care about winning as much as they do making horsefeathers tons of money, that's why they have Jed. They don't seem to mind losing their shirts on ****** hotels and sports books. But that's what they have the Cubs for, to balance the books for them.
  12. lol, that is real, real bad.
  13. They aren't selling anything. It's the most significant source of passive income they've ever had.
  14. I’m just gonna say this, I expected Matthew Boyd’s arm to fall off two months ago. im officinally apologizing to Jed.
  15. I think I recall reading a study conducted at MiLB parks, which found no appreciable difference.
×
×
  • Create New...