Jump to content
North Side Baseball

CubinNY

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    27,793
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    24

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by CubinNY

  1. It's already been posted on here a number of times. I'd be good if you bothered reading anything anyone posts on here
  2. definitely in the minority. They could have dispensed with the rest of the game and decided it on the coin toss.
  3. It would be nice to have regular people like the old days. They really haven't done that since Len left and it seems JD is content with a limited schedule of road games. Backfilling exclusively with Pat (for Boog) and anyone except Suttcliffe for JD would be better. I love listening to Doug Glanville do color.
  4. <puts on tinfoil hat> MLB is doing everything it can to keep players from making as much money as possible. And in so doing irreparable damage to the quality of the game. <takes off tinfoil hat> There must be a good reason for this but I don't know what it is.
  5. I'm not the smartest person in the world or even particularly on the ball about most financial things so this entire Boras drama makes almost no sense to me. It seems like the thing to do for a player is to gather offers from teams who are interested in signing you. Sort through those offers, make a decision on exclusive negotiations and start working on a definite contract. It might not be exactly what the player wants, but it's not going to be exactly what the team wants either. I don't understand negotiating from the standpoint of We want X for Y years, come get some.
  6. I get what you are saying, but he's not going to learn to adjust to big league pitching until he's facing it. I love the way he plays the game, hopefully, he's not in Iowa for three months while they are running Tauchman out there most days.
  7. In a clever attempt to jinx the situation, I"m thinking the Cubs would have signed Bellinger by now if they were seriously considering him.
  8. I hope Tallion comes into camp in the best shape of his life. Last year he was bloated. He did have a great spring though
  9. I don't think he needs to do that specifically, but they are going to be the worst team in the AL East. He was hired because he will likely follow the same path as Jed.
  10. didn't the Cubs have a guy named Cam Sanders? Are they the same person?
  11. Jed will likely have the job for as long as he wants it. He and the Ricketss are simpatico.
  12. are you nuts?
  13. It’s not as if other teams in the division have done nothing. We should put last year in the books. It’s over. Their record was how good they were. that said, other teams have not done much or are taking a step back. On the plus side, the kids are going to play. They have a manager who knows how to manage a bullpen. They have good youngish starting pitching, and if those guys take a step up, one of the better rotations top to bottom in the league. the questions for me are, how are they going to score enough runs consistently to win. And if the pitching staff can limit the long ball. They have the potential to give up a lot of HRs. I don’t know what to make of them, high floor, low ceiling, maybe until the trade deadline and then let’s see.
  14. Each team in the division is mediocre.
  15. Except they don’t benefit young players
  16. For me, Yamamoto was target 1-2-and 3. I could be Jed for the rest of the field. I do think the guy they got can be pretty good if he can minimize HRsz
  17. Jed + rebuilt the minor leagues and development team, draft team is better, 86ing Ross Jed - rigidity in signing FA, record at ML level, I think they have ownership that is taking profit after investing in Wrigley and dealing with COVID. I think ownership found their man to run the organization like they want it ran with their philosophy for sustainability. I don’t know that Jed is up to that task. The next few years will tell us.
  18. bet the over, lol.
  19. I get the angst, but let's wait and see what happens.
  20. There is a lot more that goes into trying to measure defensive value. A hit is easy to measure. With defense, you have to take into account where the ball was hit, where the guy was standing before the ball was hit, his ability to get to a baseball quickly and catch it, how quickly the ball is released once it is caught, how hard it is thrown, how accurate the throw is, and a bunch of stuff I'm probably missing. We can get a good indication and rank order of guys who are better and worse at those things by position using statistical analysis, even though the difference between them may be small and unimportant for several players and larger for others. But most of the time if a guy is not good based on the eye test, he's never going to be in the group of players for that position for which there is enough data to get useful analysis. The thing about statistics is that the numbers don't mean anything until they get large enough for predictive value. Then when they get super large, small and unimportant differences may be statistically significant but have little practical difference.
  21. The question is who is being more unreasonable? One would think these guys would have signed somewhere if they thought they were getting a fair deal. But it's hard to know what Boras is up to and we may only find out until this is all over if ever. We don't know how much the recent media stuff is leaked by the teams or by Boars. I keep coming back to the idea that Jed is mostly happy with the direction of the team right now. In theory, he will have a lot of money available at the trade deadline and even more next year.
  22. Descriptive statistics measure the real aspects of a population or the environment. Inferential statistics are models. The basis of the usefulness of each is dependent upon how close they approximate reality. I feel like we have this type of discussion multiple times a year. Reality is never not real. A statistical model's usefulness depends on how closely it matches reality. And when it does not match reality the reasons lie in measurement error due to the complexity of the system, not in some mystical metaphysical property of the universe.
  23. It's not the same. If I don't spend $5 on a coffee, that's real money in my pocket. I'm not saying it's not a potentially valuable tool, I'm saying it's not measuring a real thing other than catching or catching and throwing, the outcome of which may result in a team not scoring a run that otherwise would have scored. It's a shorthand way of talking about defensive value. It's not a shorthand way of talking about taking away a run the same way a CF jumps over the fence and robs a home run or a SS nails a guy from the outfield at home who is trying to score on a double.
  24. Doesn't that depend on an actual run scoring? So if a run scored, I'd assign 1 run. If a run didn't score, I'd assign 0.
×
×
  • Create New...