NFL Playoffs: Wildcard Round

[Soul]

The Packers are losing, like, every single matchup up & down the line on those runs.

[Derwood]

Fraud team is a fraud

[JudasIscariotTheBird]

Yall are salty merely because the Packers are not the Bears. 13-3 is most assuredly the upper end of what they could have done, but they were the 2nd or 3rd best team in the NFC and it isn't really debatable. Claiming they should have been an 8-8 team is just trolling powered by extreme salt.

[minnesotacubsfan]

Yall are salty merely because the Packers are not the Bears. 13-3 is most assuredly the upper end of what they could have done, but they were the 2nd or 3rd best team in the NFC and it isn't really debatable. Claiming they should have been an 8-8 team is just trolling powered by extreme salt.

 

 

So? horsefeathers GB

[Cubswin11]

Yall are salty merely because the Packers are not the Bears. 13-3 is most assuredly the upper end of what they could have done, but they were the 2nd or 3rd best team in the NFC and it isn't really debatable. Claiming they should have been an 8-8 team is just trolling powered by extreme salt.

I’m not a Bears fan or fan of any NFL team. The Packers were frauds, this happens every year with a few teams over performing. Their true talent was definitely more of a 8 or 9 win team or so, they just weren’t very good. Certainly not 13 win good to me.

[JudasIscariotTheBird]

Yall are salty merely because the Packers are not the Bears. 13-3 is most assuredly the upper end of what they could have done, but they were the 2nd or 3rd best team in the NFC and it isn't really debatable. Claiming they should have been an 8-8 team is just trolling powered by extreme salt.

 

 

So? horsefeathers GB

[PackLandVA]

The 49ers are going to horsefeathers around and let Aaron Rodgers pull this game out of his ass, I’m afraid.

 

Orr not.

[gflore34]

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/gnb/2019.htm - all the numbers suggest an average team, they did get some fortunate bounces,

Yes, that is indeed their pro football reference page. Well spotted.

hell, the Bears weren't all that far from sweeping them.

 

 

34 - 7

 

[JudasIscariotTheBird]

Yall are salty merely because the Packers are not the Bears. 13-3 is most assuredly the upper end of what they could have done, but they were the 2nd or 3rd best team in the NFC and it isn't really debatable. Claiming they should have been an 8-8 team is just trolling powered by extreme salt.

I’m not a Bears fan or fan of any NFL team. The Packers were frauds, this happens every year with a few teams over performing. Their true talent was definitely more of a 8 or 9 win team or so, they just weren’t very good. Certainly not 13 win good to me.

Even that random ass website had their average outcome as 9.7 wins (which, if you aren't good at math, is closer to a 10 wins team). They had a lot of games where they took the lead early and sat on their wins by milking out the clock...and they got sh1t kicked by the 49ers and somehow the Chargers. Ok. Sure, 8-8 it is. Whatever. "Frauds" whatever that means.

Edited January 20, 2020 by JudasIscariotTheBird

[JudasIscariotTheBird]

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/gnb/2019.htm - all the numbers suggest an average team, they did get some fortunate bounces,

Yes, that is indeed their pro football reference page. Well spotted.

hell, the Bears weren't all that far from sweeping them.

 

 

34 - 7

 

What does 34-7 (nee 13) have to do with 10-7 and 21-13? Sweep?! I mean come on, join reality with me.

Edited January 20, 2020 by JudasIscariotTheBird

[Derwood]

The 49ers are going to horsefeathers around and let Aaron Rodgers pull this game out of his ass, I’m afraid.

 

Orr not.

 

thaaaaat is not my quote

[Derwood]

Yes, that is indeed their pro football reference page. Well spotted.

 

 

 

34 - 7

 

What does 34-7 (nee 14) have to do with 10-7 and 21-13? Sweep?! I mean come on, join reality with me.

 

nee 13

[gflore34]

Yes, that is indeed their pro football reference page. Well spotted.

 

 

 

34 - 7

 

What does 34-7 (nee 14) have to do with 10-7 and 21-13? Sweep?! I mean come on, join reality with me.

 

 

Nothing, 34 - 13, I can do arithmetic, just wanted to add a GIF of Ray Liotta laughing at the score.

[JudasIscariotTheBird]

 

 

34 - 7

 

What does 34-7 (nee 14) have to do with 10-7 and 21-13? Sweep?! I mean come on, join reality with me.

 

nee 13

This probably reduces their average playoff record to 1-1.13!!! FRAUDS!!!

[Cubswin11]

Yall are salty merely because the Packers are not the Bears. 13-3 is most assuredly the upper end of what they could have done, but they were the 2nd or 3rd best team in the NFC and it isn't really debatable. Claiming they should have been an 8-8 team is just trolling powered by extreme salt.

I’m not a Bears fan or fan of any NFL team. The Packers were frauds, this happens every year with a few teams over performing. Their true talent was definitely more of a 8 or 9 win team or so, they just weren’t very good. Certainly not 13 win good to me.

Even that random ass website had their average outcome as 9.7 wins (which, if you aren't good at math, is closer to a 10 wins team). They had a lot of games where they took the lead early and sat on their wins by milking out the clock...and they got sh1t kicked by the 49ers and somehow the Chargers. Ok. Sure, 8-8 it is. Whatever. "Frauds" whatever that means.

8, 9, 10. I don’t give a horsefeathers, this team just wasn’t that good. If you’re good at math 9.7 is closer to 8 than 13. They are and were frauds and 13 wins wasn’t indicative of their true talent level. A perfectly solid season, they achieved more than most probably expected and thought. Just don’t think they were particularly good.

[JudasIscariotTheBird]

I’m not a Bears fan or fan of any NFL team. The Packers were frauds, this happens every year with a few teams over performing. Their true talent was definitely more of a 8 or 9 win team or so, they just weren’t very good. Certainly not 13 win good to me.

Even that random ass website had their average outcome as 9.7 wins (which, if you aren't good at math, is closer to a 10 wins team). They had a lot of games where they took the lead early and sat on their wins by milking out the clock...and they got sh1t kicked by the 49ers and somehow the Chargers. Ok. Sure, 8-8 it is. Whatever. "Frauds" whatever that means.

8, 9, 10. I don’t give a horsefeathers, this team just wasn’t that good. If you’re good at math 9.7 is closer to 8 than 13. They are and were frauds and 13 wins wasn’t indicative of their true talent level. A perfectly solid season, they achieved more than most probably expected and thought. Just don’t think they were particularly good.

If you looked at any ol team through history that actually reached 13 wins, and then looked at the number of teams that were "expected" to win 13 or more games based off of point differentials, you'd probably reduce your list of teams by a good 70%. The Packers were a pretty good team this year.

 

Edit: For instnace: https://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/nor/2019.htm

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/sfo/2019.htm

Edited January 20, 2020 by JudasIscariotTheBird

[gflore34]

What does 34-7 (nee 14) have to do with 10-7 and 21-13? Sweep?! I mean come on, join reality with me.

 

nee 13

This probably reduces their average playoff record to 1-1.13!!! FRAUDS!!!

 

Think it reduces their 2019 Super Bowl appearances to that of 2019 Bears - 0.

[JudasIscariotTheBird]

 

nee 13

This probably reduces their average playoff record to 1-1.13!!! FRAUDS!!!

 

Think it reduces their 2019 Super Bowl appearances to that of 2019 Bears - 0.

Well, the game isn't over, so at the moment, the chance that the Pack makes the SB is INFINITELY better than that of the Bears.

[Soul]

Not over yet

[Soul]

This probably reduces their average playoff record to 1-1.13!!! FRAUDS!!!

 

Think it reduces their 2019 Super Bowl appearances to that of 2019 Bears - 0.

Well, the game isn't over, so at the moment, the chance that the Pack makes the SB is INFINITELY better than that of the Bears.

 

It’s just that we’ve seen actual good GB teams and this one doesn’t match up to those, really in any way except Rodgers. They scrapped by with a lot of riff raff which is cool, but this game was what they really were when matched up against quality.

 

I’ll admit some jealousy because the Bears NEVER turn horsefeathers to gold like GB, but I’ve watched enough football and so have you. This wasn’t a good team. That’s not an insult, just being real.

[gflore34]

This probably reduces their average playoff record to 1-1.13!!! FRAUDS!!!

 

Think it reduces their 2019 Super Bowl appearances to that of 2019 Bears - 0.

Well, the game isn't over, so at the moment, the chance that the Pack makes the SB is INFINITELY better than that of the Bears.

 

Not any more....

[JudasIscariotTheBird]

 

Think it reduces their 2019 Super Bowl appearances to that of 2019 Bears - 0.

Well, the game isn't over, so at the moment, the chance that the Pack makes the SB is INFINITELY better than that of the Bears.

 

It’s just that we’ve seen actual good GB teams and this one doesn’t match up to those, really in any way except Rodgers. They scrapped by with a lot of riff raff which is cool, but this game was what they really were when matched up against quality.

 

I’ll admit some jealousy because the Bears NEVER turn horsefeathers to gold like GB, but I’ve watched enough football and so have you. This wasn’t a good team. That’s not an insult, just being real.

This was about a 10-6/11-5 team. It was Rodgers and an ok OL and an above average defence, and nothing more. I think they'll be just as good next year. If they strike gold with a WR draft pick and some other complimentary D piece, I think they are better next year.

Edited January 20, 2020 by JudasIscariotTheBird

[JudasIscariotTheBird]

 

Think it reduces their 2019 Super Bowl appearances to that of 2019 Bears - 0.

Well, the game isn't over, so at the moment, the chance that the Pack makes the SB is INFINITELY better than that of the Bears.

 

Not any more....

[gflore34]

Well, the game isn't over, so at the moment, the chance that the Pack makes the SB is INFINITELY better than that of the Bears.

 

It’s just that we’ve seen actual good GB teams and this one doesn’t match up to those, really in any way except Rodgers. They scrapped by with a lot of riff raff which is cool, but this game was what they really were when matched up against quality.

 

I’ll admit some jealousy because the Bears NEVER turn horsefeathers to gold like GB, but I’ve watched enough football and so have you. This wasn’t a good team. That’s not an insult, just being real.

This was about a 10-6/11-5 team. It was Rodgers and an ok OL and an above average defence, and nothing more. I think they'll be just as good next year. If they strike gold with a WR draft pick and some other complimentary D piece, I think they are better next year.

 

Above average defense? What was above average about it?

[Brian]

Something fun to think about the Packers have had around a top 5, at least, in the league QB for almost 30 years now and have been to 3 Super Bowls winning 2. They really should have been the NFC Patriots.