2016/17 offseason

[JudasIscariotTheBird]

I'm certain that Dansby Swanson would have powered my team to victory.

[Tim]

Can we restart the league so I can brag about picking up Hoskins for nothing last year?

[CaliforniaRaisin]

Can we restart the league so I can brag about picking up Hoskins for nothing last year?

 

And I had Aaron Judge.

[sneakypower]

we could give it a try

[tadowdaddy]

Wow, just realizing this died. Good job guys keeping it going for so long. It was a fun 12 or so years before I retired. Checked this to see how it was going. If anyone would like to participate in a money type dynasty league like this, let's talk soon. I'd be happy to start it up.

[stitchface]

Wow, just realizing this died. Good job guys keeping it going for so long. It was a fun 12 or so years before I retired. Checked this to see how it was going. If anyone would like to participate in a money type dynasty league like this, let's talk soon. I'd be happy to start it up.

 

"we're getting the band back together." Sounds like more fun than discussing the Brewers.

[Tim]

Wow, just realizing this died. Good job guys keeping it going for so long. It was a fun 12 or so years before I retired. Checked this to see how it was going. If anyone would like to participate in a money type dynasty league like this, let's talk soon. I'd be happy to start it up.

 

"we're getting the band back together." Sounds like more fun than discussing the Brewers.

yeah, sure, I'm in.

[sneakypower]

i'd be interested

[tadowdaddy]

If we're going to do something like this for money, we'd have to find about 12 teams is my guess. 16 would be better. Anyone else interested?

[stitchface]

If we're going to do something like this for money, we'd have to find about 12 teams is my guess. 16 would be better. Anyone else interested?

 

this might not be the best place to recruit. 16 is too unwieldy. I would go 12 or even better 8. I don't care if it's for money or not.

[JudasIscariotTheBird]

I think it is much easier to keep a dynasty league together without money for two reasons. The first is that when someone is bad at this and they ditch a really crap roster, its easier to get someone else to take it over. And secondly, when the (nameless) super-active trade guy who also happens to know all the participants better than others makes a LOT of trades that might seem lopsided, the hurt feelings are attached to much lower stakes.

 

I'd also be interested.

[JudasIscariotTheBird]

(Also, when I played a few years ago I had no idea that it was a money league...)

[tadowdaddy]

Thanks for the feedback Juan. Let me do some pondering. Also, if you know anyone else that'd be interested, I'd throw together a free one too.

[abuck1220]

i'd do a free one. people got feisty enough about this when it was free, i don't want to see how everyone acts if there is $ involved.

[MembersOnlyJacket]

I'd play regardless of the stakes. I think I still have Kershaw. Tim - remember when we traded A-Rod for Kershaw ? :stickman:

[stitchface]

well, that's 8 counting raisin.