Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Are Theo Epstein and Jed Hoyer doing a good job as President and GM?  

47 members have voted

  1. 1. Are Theo Epstein and Jed Hoyer doing a good job as President and GM?

    • Yes
      47
    • No
      0


Posted
because we all know that a player's trade value is predicated solely on his most recent season's fangraphs WAR, while things like ERA, FIP, injury history, strikeout rate, and previous seasons' performance have no bearing. if only theo had convinced another general manager to gaze at garza's 2.95 FIP in 2011 while ignoring that his FIP had been over 4.00 every other season in his major league career.
  • Replies 160
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

The job of these guys is to field a competitive major league baseball team. These guys are in a unique and extremely safe and cushy situation with no expectations because unlikely literally anybody else they do not have a win a single game in the majors to be considered to be doing their job. These guys have an unprecedented single mandate to build up the farm system, which is incredibly easy to do when you are tanking every season and under no pressure to actually graduate prospects or use them in trades to try and improve the major league team.

 

They are doing a good job at doing the only part of their job they have focused on, the easy part, while the only part that actually matters, the major league team, has been completely forsaken. But given that ownership has either allowed or mandated them to act this way, they can't be completely blamed for taking the easy way out and putting together garbage major league teams.

 

I see no reason to vote yes or no on this issue.

Posted
because we all know that a player's trade value is predicated solely on his most recent season's fangraphs WAR, while things like ERA, FIP, injury history, strikeout rate, and previous seasons' performance have no bearing. if only theo had convinced another general manager to gaze at garza's 2.95 FIP in 2011 while ignoring that his FIP had been over 4.00 every other season in his major league career.

 

Sounds like the front office blew it and missed a sell-high opportunity.

Posted

also sounds like some people don't understand how player valuation works.

 

not to mention that they still traded guy they "missed their opportunity" to sell high on, and got such a return that the other general manager admitted to getting ripped off.

Posted
also sounds like some people don't understand how player valuation works.

 

Sounds like your definition of player valuation is "whatever I have to make up as I go to absolve the front office of everything, ever."

 

not to mention that they still traded guy they "missed their opportunity" to sell high on, and got such a return that the other general manager admitted to getting ripped off.

 

Holy crap is that dumb quote by Daniels, mostly based on how they didn't get to the playoffs, ever causing people to overrate the crap out of the middling return we got for Garza.

Guest
Guests
Posted
I can't wait until CJ Edwards is awesome again and you're throwing your hands in the air over pitcher valuation in a few months.
Posted
yes because i don't think that cherry picking one season of fangraphs WAR while ignoring every other season and statistic is an accurate representation of how a player would be valued on the trade market, that's exactly it davearm, i mean kyle.
Posted (edited)

Let's ask a really smart poster in Jan. 2012 about the relative valuation of Garza at the time.

 

Take it away, TT:

 

"Climbing toward market rate prices" in this case apparently means ~30 million in surplus value over two years.

 

Well, yeah.

 

$30 million in surplus value over two years isn't enough to get you multiple blue chip prospects, unless teams get really desperate for starting pitching. They might get that desperate eventually, but at the moment it doesn't seem that way.

 

It's not? Gio Gonzalez just got the proverbial truck of prospects backed up for him to provide what, 40 million in surplus value over 4 years? Mat Latos was largely the same as well, and both of those guys pitch in canyons that might mask their true ability a touch.

Both of them were younger and under team control for longer.

 

And also not as productive, that's why we're talking about the surplus value added over the duration of their team control.

 

 

Man, only *crazy* people think Garza had comparable value to those guys. Or that his being more productive in 2011 was relevant.

Edited by Hairyducked Idiot
Posted
yes because i don't think that cherry picking one season of fangraphs WAR while ignoring every other season and statistic is an accurate representation of how a player would be valued on the trade market, that's exactly it davearm, i mean kyle.

 

What exactly are you basing your surplus value figures on? Last year's WAR?

 

An expected WAR(~5 WAR for Garza, ~3.5 for Gio and Latos), which obviously is heavily influenced by last year.

Posted

I get that you aren't one of our better baseball minds here, and that you make up for it by acting horrified at every single contrary opinion and pretending like it's the dumbest thing you've ever heard. You don't have a lot of clubs in your bag, so it's a shot you have to take pretty much every time.

 

But please, leave these discussions to your betters.

Guest
Guests
Posted
cringe factor is so high on uppity faux cocky Kyle
Posted
Jesus. players aren't traded based on fangraphs WAR. and good luck selling opposing GMs on garza being a 5 win player when he was regularly a 2-3 win player for every other season of his career, he had just posted his first FIP under 4.00 and his home run rate magically halved in his career year. not to mention that gonzalez had more arbitration years left and had just posted two seasons of 200 innings and an ERA a shade over 3.
Posted
cringe factor is so high on uppity faux cocky Kyle

 

It's not faux.

 

I didn't see a lot of this "Oh man, his FIP has always been over 4 before last year!" in the offseason of 2012.

 

It's a total about-face. Which is fine, I don't have a problem with people changing their minds. But to then act like someone who agrees with the consensus at the time is being dumb and crazy? Get out of here with that weak crap.

Posted
http://i.imgur.com/s3HnORX.pnghttp://i.imgur.com/WlTRA5D.pnghttp://i.imgur.com/gn3jXFz.pnghttp://i.imgur.com/59v3yAF.pnghttp://i.imgur.com/shz6fnY.png

 

That A's roster is pretty shitty

Guest
Guests
Posted
Yes, I was too lazy to do pitching staffs too, but that's definitely where the A's had their strength, and proceeded to make a bunch of trades from that strength after 2011. They also had the biggest single prospect impact with Donaldson becoming an MVP candidate.
Posted
Yes, I was too lazy to do pitching staffs too, but that's definitely where the A's had their strength, and proceeded to make a bunch of trades from that strength after 2011. They also had the single biggest prospect impact with Donaldson becoming an MVP candidate.

 

The Cubs had some pitching too that they could have traded from.

 

Replace Donaldson's fWAR with Valbuena's in 2013 and the A's still win the division.

Posted
Jesus. players aren't traded based on fangraphs WAR. and good luck selling opposing GMs on garza being a 5 win player when he was regularly a 2-3 win player for every other season of his career, he had just posted his first FIP under 4.00 and his home run rate magically halved in his career year. not to mention that gonzalez had more arbitration years left and had just posted two seasons of 200 innings and an ERA a shade over 3.

 

The good thing is Gio Gonzalez was an easy sell as a 5 win player what with his 6.6 fWAR over 535 career innings.

Posted
Yes, I was too lazy to do pitching staffs too, but that's definitely where the A's had their strength, and proceeded to make a bunch of trades from that strength after 2011. They also had the biggest single prospect impact with Donaldson becoming an MVP candidate.

 

Well we did turn our existing pitching into Samardzija the starter, Travis Wood, and Anthony Rizzo.

Posted
Jesus. players aren't traded based on fangraphs WAR. and good luck selling opposing GMs on garza being a 5 win player when he was regularly a 2-3 win player for every other season of his career, he had just posted his first FIP under 4.00 and his home run rate magically halved in his career year. not to mention that gonzalez had more arbitration years left and had just posted two seasons of 200 innings and an ERA a shade over 3.

 

The good thing is Gio Gonzalez was an easy sell as a 5 win player what with his 6.6 fWAR over 535 career innings.

 

do you seriously believe that i have been arguing gio gonzalez is or was viewed as a 5 win player? or is it that you just cannot engage in an argument/discussion without creating some absurd strawman?

Posted
Holy crap is that dumb quote by Daniels, mostly based on how they didn't get to the playoffs, ever causing people to overrate the crap out of the middling return we got for Garza.

 

The PTBNL news is really nice. This is a really good return for Garza, all told.
Guest
Guests
Posted
Holy crap is that dumb quote by Daniels, mostly based on how they didn't get to the playoffs, ever causing people to overrate the crap out of the middling return we got for Garza.

 

The PTBNL news is really nice. This is a really good return for Garza, all told.

 

he's going to come back with stuff about how hindsight matters and he's allowed to change his opinion on it as time goes

 

that or he'll blame a wizard for posting that

Posted

It's fine for people to change their opinions. I recommend it. It's just uncanny how those opinions always seem to be changing lately in ways that aim to make Epstein's failures more defensible, and it's dumb to act hysterical about how dumb people are for not changing with you.

 

 

It was a really good return for what Garza turned into by 2013, but it was a very meh return compared to what he could have gotten a year and a half earlier.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...