Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Replies 608
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Personally, I had no problem with the call. I wanted a TD there and it was going to be tough to push it in. On the road with a struggling offense, you take your shots. The execution was not good.

 

Exactly....execution wasn't good. That's a difficult pass to make. Not one you ask your inexperienced backup QB to make in the red zone when you are in a position to take the lead before halftime.

 

 

The Raiders played it well. What can you do? The play is supposed to set up so the TE is isolated. If that happens, there's a great chance to score.

 

What you can do is run a less risky play for your inexperieced backup QB. You are just about guaranteed 3 points. The way this offense is going, you are probably only going to get 2-3 chances to score all game, and you just wasted one of them by making your QB make a difficult throw instead of running it for a 1st down inside the 10.

 

Isn't the fact that they are struggling to score an argument FOR trying to score a TD?

 

You're not taking away the chance of a TD. You are making it much more likely that your QB is getting some points.

Posted

How the hell are there so many [expletive] people wide open?

 

The secondary and offensive line have been absolutely awful in a game they couldnt afford to be anything less than good in.

Posted

 

not when you're D can hold the other guys, kick the FG

 

We'd still be losing 10-12... Better than 7-15, but I personally don't mind gambling on that play if the potential is 14-12 lead. That's my point.

Posted

 

not when you're D can hold the other guys, kick the FG

 

We'd still be losing 10-12... Better than 7-15, but I personally don't mind gambling on that play if the potential is 14-12 lead. That's my point.

 

No you could be winning 14-12. Do you not think the Bears could manage to get 10 yards on 3-4 plays using conservative playcalling (aka running the ball or high percentage throws?

Posted

 

not when you're D can hold the other guys, kick the FG

 

We'd still be losing 10-12... Better than 7-15, but I personally don't mind gambling on that play if the potential is 14-12 lead. That's my point.

 

YOU DON'T GAMBLE WITH YOUR BACKUP QB THROWING A SCREEN FROM THE 7 YARD LINE. There are plenty of other plays that make sense on 2nd and 1 that can lead to a TD. Get it?

Posted

 

not when you're D can hold the other guys, kick the FG

 

We'd still be losing 10-12... Better than 7-15, but I personally don't mind gambling on that play if the potential is 14-12 lead. That's my point.

 

No you could be winning 14-12. Do you not think the Bears could manage to get 10 yards on 3-4 plays using conservative playcalling (aka running the ball or high percentage throws?

 

Screen pass is a high percentage throw. I'm done with this conversation. Sorry, it's gone on too long.

Posted
my feed is at least a minute behind kujays

 

Sorry.

 

I'm just watching on Directv.

 

This is depressing because this is (was?) a winnable game. I thought before this game that we might lose this one but KC and Denver were sure wins. I'm not so sure now.

Posted

Bears starting field position today:

 

OWN 18

OWN 23

OWN 16

OWN 18

OWN 3

OWN 26

OAK 35

OWN 20

OWN 17

OWN 18

 

That's special teams ownage. Only one drive started better than the Bears 26 yardline. 6 drives out of 10 started inside the 20.

Posted

 

not when you're D can hold the other guys, kick the FG

 

We'd still be losing 10-12... Better than 7-15, but I personally don't mind gambling on that play if the potential is 14-12 lead. That's my point.

 

No you could be winning 14-12. Do you not think the Bears could manage to get 10 yards on 3-4 plays using conservative playcalling (aka running the ball or high percentage throws?

 

Screen pass is a high percentage throw. I'm done with this conversation. Sorry, it's gone on too long.

 

Nope.

Posted

 

not when you're D can hold the other guys, kick the FG

 

We'd still be losing 10-12... Better than 7-15, but I personally don't mind gambling on that play if the potential is 14-12 lead. That's my point.

 

No you could be winning 14-12. Do you not think the Bears could manage to get 10 yards on 3-4 plays using conservative playcalling (aka running the ball or high percentage throws?

 

Screen pass is a high percentage throw. I'm done with this conversation. Sorry, it's gone on too long.

 

That's not just a simple screen pass. He had to throw across his body because the play was designed as a misdirection. Not high percentage at all...actually quite difficult.

 

I'll stop though, you are right.

Posted
Bears starting field position today:

 

OWN 18

OWN 23

OWN 16

OWN 18

OWN 3

OWN 26

OAK 35

OWN 20

OWN 17

OWN 18

 

That's special teams ownage. Only one drive started better than the Bears 26 yardline. 6 drives out of 10 started inside the 20.

 

do the raiders

 

i want to convince myself the defense isn't that bad.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...