Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
Did you read any of Scotti's posts?

Yes I read the entire thing. The Cubs, Bears, and Sox are not equitable because the public has an ownership stake in the Bears and Sox venues.

1) You missed the finer points of those comparisons

2) that was far from the only thing he discussed

I did not miss anything, I chose not address the finer points because the larger point renders them moot and I don't really have the time. The finer points are misleading and that's an understatement. Cub fans pay more taxes because there are more of them staying in hotels?
  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Yeah, just threaten to move.

 

I'm sick of hearing all these complaints from the city and Wrigleyville residents. No more night games. No more renovations. No more traffic. No more money. How about no more Cubs? Let's see how they like that.

 

When the jobs and customers go away, and their real estate all the sudden crashes in value, they will wish they put up with a few more night games and renovations. Even a few strangers peeing on their lawn at night.

Posted
Did you read any of Scotti's posts?

Yes I read the entire thing. The Cubs, Bears, and Sox are not equitable because the public has an ownership stake in the Bears and Sox venues.

1) You missed the finer points of those comparisons

2) that was far from the only thing he discussed

I did not miss anything, I chose not address the finer points because the larger point renders them moot and I don't really have the time. The finer points are misleading and that's an understatement. Cub fans pay more taxes because there are more of them staying in hotels?

 

What the original Cub plan proposed was, in part, for the "entertainment tax" to be capped at 2009's level (the $16M) for a given period (IIRC, 15 years) and any further generated revenue (generated ONLY because of further investments in Wrigley) be used as security for a bond (the expected means of paying off said bond would actually be the 2% sales tax on hotels that also pays off the Bears and Sox bonds).

 

Why are you opposed to this?

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...