Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
I don't know if he still does ESPN TV ever but Jon Sciambi is awesome.

 

I don't know if he does TV for ESPN either, but he's the Sunday Night Baseball PBP guy on ESPN Radio along with Dave Campbell.

 

He had a great line about Lou constantly getting Marshall warmed up. When Campbell (who is just so god awful and obsessed with the Yankees) was talking about the Cubs bullpen struggling and forcing Lou to go to another reliever, the PBP guy said, "but nothing says it has to be Marshall every time."

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
I don't know if he still does ESPN TV ever but Jon Sciambi is awesome.

 

I don't know if he does TV for ESPN either, but he's the Sunday Night Baseball PBP guy on ESPN Radio along with Dave Campbell.

 

He had a great line about Lou constantly getting Marshall warmed up. When Campbell (who is just so god awful and obsessed with the Yankees) was talking about the Cubs bullpen struggling and forcing Lou to go to another reliever, the PBP guy said, "but nothing says it has to be Marshall every time."

 

I didn't listen to the whole broadcast, but that's a pretty good line.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Sciambi did at one point do college basketball games on the ESPN networks, I believe he still does.
Posted
Bobby Valentine is the worst. Jesus, La Russa makes me want to pull my hair out, but the snide comments are unacceptable. Just as the La Russa ball washing gets old, the constant jabbing gets just as old. You aren't half the manager he is and you never will be.
Posted
Bobby Valentine is the worst. Jesus, La Russa makes me want to pull my hair out, but the snide comments are unacceptable. Just as the La Russa ball washing gets old, the constant jabbing gets just as old. You aren't half the manager he is and you never will be.

 

Really?

 

I posted in the game thread that tonight was my favorite national broadcast I've heard in a long time. Years, maybe ever. Schulman (whom I love during college hoops), Orel and Bobby V were [expletive] awesome. They avoided cliche's, they got technical, they weren't afraid to question players/managers. It helped make that game outstanding until Lopez' HR.

Posted
Nobody can ever take enough shots at that.

This is correct. It's almost like leading off with Aaron Miles

 

It's actually nothing like that since the pitcher batting eighth is as inconsequential as Manny Ramirez batting fourth and David Ortiz batting third.

Posted
Nobody can ever take enough shots at that.

This is correct. It's almost like leading off with Aaron Miles

 

It's actually nothing like that since the pitcher batting eighth is as inconsequential as Manny Ramirez batting fourth and David Ortiz batting third.

You're giving a pitcher more PAs than certain position players over the course of the year. That's just annoying, not to mention stupid

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Nobody can ever take enough shots at that.

This is correct. It's almost like leading off with Aaron Miles

 

It's actually nothing like that since the pitcher batting eighth is as inconsequential as Manny Ramirez batting fourth and David Ortiz batting third.

You're giving a pitcher more PAs than certain position players over the course of the year. That's just annoying, not to mention stupid

 

It makes surprisingly little difference as is. If they moved Pujols up to 2nd in the order, the pitcher 8th thing would be a significant benefit. As is, it's about a wash.

Posted
Nobody can ever take enough shots at that.

This is correct. It's almost like leading off with Aaron Miles

 

It's actually nothing like that since the pitcher batting eighth is as inconsequential as Manny Ramirez batting fourth and David Ortiz batting third.

You're giving a pitcher more PAs than certain position players over the course of the year. That's just annoying, not to mention stupid

 

http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/article/is-larussa-right-to-bat-his-pitcher-in-the-eight-slot/

Posted
It makes surprisingly little difference as is. If they moved Pujols up to 2nd in the order, the pitcher 8th thing would be a significant benefit. As is, it's about a wash.

 

Why would it be a significant benefit if Pujols moved to 2nd? In that scenario, it seems like you're lineup is the same as if you batted Pujols 3rd and kept everything else normal, except the pitcher gets a few more PAs and there is the potential for fewer guys on base before Pujols in the first inning.

Guest
Guests
Posted
Why would it be a significant benefit if Pujols moved to 2nd?

 

It increases the team's run expectancy.

 

Why?

If nothing else, 30 extra PA's for Pujols over the course of a season.

Posted
Why would it be a significant benefit if Pujols moved to 2nd?

 

It increases the team's run expectancy.

 

Why?

If nothing else, 30 extra PA's for Pujols over the course of a season.

 

30 times a year the #2 hitter makes the last out of a ballgame? that seems like too much.

Guest
Guests
Posted
Why would it be a significant benefit if Pujols moved to 2nd?

 

It increases the team's run expectancy.

 

Why?

If nothing else, 30 extra PA's for Pujols over the course of a season.

 

30 times a year the #2 hitter makes the last out of a ballgame? that seems like too much.

Sorry, put that in from memory without thinking about it.

 

Figure an average of 1/9th of games where the #2 hitter makes the last out. 162/9 = 18 extra PA's a year. It's probably more on the order of 15 as the bottom of the order is more likely to make outs (in general).

 

Not a huge difference in run expectancy, but it's one factor.

Posted
Why would it be a significant benefit if Pujols moved to 2nd?

 

It increases the team's run expectancy.

 

Why?

 

http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/article/is-larussa-right-to-bat-his-pitcher-in-the-eight-slot/

 

That doesn't explain why moving the pitcher to eight and then moving Pujols to second improves run expectancy. It doesn't even address moving Pujols and it says batting the pitcher 7th (for the Cardinals in 2007) is optimal. It really doesn't explain my question, unless I missed something.

Posted
Why would it be a significant benefit if Pujols moved to 2nd?

 

It increases the team's run expectancy.

 

Why?

If nothing else, 30 extra PA's for Pujols over the course of a season.

 

I understand that in the most general of senses, but Rob said moving the pitcher to 8 and Pujols to 2 at the same time will be a significant benefit. I don't understand the thinking in making both those moves.

Posted
That doesn't explain why moving the pitcher to eight and then moving Pujols to second improves run expectancy. It doesn't even address moving Pujols and it says batting the pitcher 7th (for the Cardinals in 2007) is optimal. It really doesn't explain my question, unless I missed something.

 

Sorry, it was early (or late, I can't remember right now) and I thought the discussion was still about pitchers batting eighth.

 

You should consult Tom Tango. I am certain that he has done plenty of work on why not just Pujols -- but every team's best hitter -- should bat second.

Posted

 

Alright, thanks. We're getting closer, but that still doesn't address the combo of Pujols 2/pitcher 8. In fact, Tango says only in extreme situations (Adam Everett, Tony Pena Jr) should you hit your pitcher 8th.

 

I may have misread his post, but it appeared to me that Rob was putting importance on the combo of moving the pitcher to the 8 spot and Pujols (or the best hitter in the lineup, I would assume) to the 2 spot. I don't see the connection.

Posted

 

Alright, thanks. We're getting closer, but that still doesn't address the combo of Pujols 2/pitcher 8. In fact, Tango says only in extreme situations (Adam Everett, Tony Pena Jr) should you hit your pitcher 8th.

 

I may have misread his post, but it appeared to me that Rob was putting importance on the combo of moving the pitcher to the 8 spot and Pujols (or the best hitter in the lineup, I would assume) to the 2 spot. I don't see the connection.

 

you misread, that was saying you should only bat your worst position player 8th in the American League if it's an extreme situation.

 

Batting your best hitter 2nd is optimal and the effect is maximized when you have your pitcher 8th because it increases the RBI opportunities for the top of the lineup.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...