Jump to content
North Side Baseball

What's wrong with Aramis?


This feels a lot like the Soriano situation last year, where he was playing hurt but had to much pride to take any time off. Maybe Aramis is still a bit self-conscious of his injury prone label that he had moreso early in his career and wants to play through it. If this is the case, sitting him and not hitting him 4th/5th when he is in the lineup is the best move. At this point, I'm a lot more confident in Fontebaker than Aramis.

 

I doubt it has anything to do with being self conscious of his image. If it is injury related and won't go on the DL, it's probably because all signs are that it's not a big enough injury to land him on the DL. Was it Rolen that spent a season hitting like crap with a shoulder problem that wasn't bad enough to land him on the DL?

 

What is 'bad enough' to go on the DL, though? If you can take 15 days off and feel a lot better rather than consistently struggling and needing a lot off days, then there's a choice to be made. Whether the choice is made by Aramis, Piniella, Hendry or all of the above is what we don't know, but players have gone on the DL in similar circumstances before.

 

If you have a seperated shoulder, a doctor tells you, and you go on the DL. If your shoulder seems fine, but something is off after the healing process (something like scar tissue), you may have no idea other than the poor results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 37
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

This feels a lot like the Soriano situation last year, where he was playing hurt but had to much pride to take any time off. Maybe Aramis is still a bit self-conscious of his injury prone label that he had moreso early in his career and wants to play through it. If this is the case, sitting him and not hitting him 4th/5th when he is in the lineup is the best move. At this point, I'm a lot more confident in Fontebaker than Aramis.

 

I doubt it has anything to do with being self conscious of his image. If it is injury related and won't go on the DL, it's probably because all signs are that it's not a big enough injury to land him on the DL. Was it Rolen that spent a season hitting like crap with a shoulder problem that wasn't bad enough to land him on the DL?

 

What is 'bad enough' to go on the DL, though? If you can take 15 days off and feel a lot better rather than consistently struggling and needing a lot off days, then there's a choice to be made. Whether the choice is made by Aramis, Piniella, Hendry or all of the above is what we don't know, but players have gone on the DL in similar circumstances before.

 

If you have a seperated shoulder, a doctor tells you, and you go on the DL. If your shoulder seems fine, but something is off after the healing process (something like scar tissue), you may have no idea other than the poor results.

 

Yeah, but in this case, we aren't just talking about his separated shoulder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, but in this case, we aren't just talking about his separated shoulder.

 

I'm not sure what you are talking about, I was just giving an example to answer your question about how something could be "not bad enough to go on the DL". If it's something that is not obviously bothering a guy to the point that a doctor can say this is what is wrong with you, you need 3 weeks rest to heal, then that could be something you can physically play through, but possibly not play well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, but in this case, we aren't just talking about his separated shoulder.

 

I'm not sure what you are talking about, I was just giving an example to answer your question about how something could be "not bad enough to go on the DL". If it's something that is not obviously bothering a guy to the point that a doctor can say this is what is wrong with you, you need 3 weeks rest to heal, then that could be something you can physically play through, but possibly not play well.

 

Ah yeah, I think I just misinterpreted what you were saying. I guess right now, if there's anything seriously wrong it's undiagnosed, it's hard to say DL stint will solve anything, so the current approach is probably best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm no expert, but I'd say Aramis needs to do a better job of watching the ball.

 

I took this on Saturday night. . . . you can't hit what you can't see

 

http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc3/hs289.snc3/28105_399081623468_629003468_4047262_7897986_n.jpg

 

 

 

this is also where I blast Vance for not saying "hello" on Friday night. . . . walked right by me and we both gave each other that "hey I know that guy" look. . .hahahaha.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm no expert, but I'd say Aramis needs to do a better job of watching the ball.

 

I took this on Saturday night. . . . you can't hit what you can't see

 

http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc3/hs289.snc3/28105_399081623468_629003468_4047262_7897986_n.jpg

 

 

 

this is also where I blast Vance for not saying "hello" on Friday night. . . . walked right by me and we both gave each other that "hey I know that guy" look. . .hahahaha.

 

Where did I walk by you?

 

I was there for all three games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Section 51 on Friday night. If it wasn't you it was your evil twin.

 

Funny thing about the Arlington bleachers --- 3 games, 3 fights with ejections (minimum). It happened every night. The funniest was the guy who got caught loading illegal booze into his "back pack with a straw." He was hammered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Section 51 on Friday night. If it wasn't you it was your evil twin.

 

Funny thing about the Arlington bleachers --- 3 games, 3 fights with ejections (minimum). It happened every night. The funniest was the guy who got caught loading illegal booze into his "back pack with a straw." He was hammered.

 

That was likely me; I was in section 50 that night.

 

I was in 218 on Saturday and then in 23 on Sunday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Old-Timey Member
Section 51 on Friday night. If it wasn't you it was your evil twin.

 

Funny thing about the Arlington bleachers --- 3 games, 3 fights with ejections (minimum). It happened every night. The funniest was the guy who got caught loading illegal booze into his "back pack with a straw." He was hammered.

 

That was likely me; I was in section 50 that night.

 

I was in 218 on Saturday and then in 23 on Sunday.

You have a backpack with a straw?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can Aramis be put on the DL if he's hurting the team???

 

Its really more Lou hurting the team than Aramis. Even if he is going to be given the chance to work his way out of this horrendous, season long slump, it needs to be from the 7 or 8 spot, not the 4 or 5.

 

 

this is definitely part of it. Why lou insists on Lee and Ramirez batting in the key spots of the order when they have been so unreliable this year is beyond me.

 

Aramis used to be a pretty good bad ball hitter but is just flailing at everything and k-ing more than ever before. Both him and Lee need to stop saying that they are their own best hitting coach, check their ego's and take some pointers from Rudy J. He's go everyone else raking so wtf?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...