NHL W. Conference Finals: Red Wings defeat Blackhawks 4-1

[Cynosure]

Hurry and pull Luongo, cmon wussies.

[Cynosure]

Oh wow did Sundin just throw a punch????

[Cynosure]

SUCK IT CANADIANS!!!!!!!!!!

 

6-3.... HAWKS WIN!!!!

 

 

GOOD JOB BOLLAND!!!!!!

[Butterscup1679666578]

game ovah

[Cynosure]

HAWKS GOAL

 

3 - 18:50 (EN) - Bolland scores (3), unassisted.

 

Hawks WIN 6-3!!!!!!!

[bcl412]

Home ice advantage=ours

[Hairyducked Idiot]

Home ice advantage=ours

 

Exactly. Huge, huge win.

 

If you put a gun to my head or my life savings on the line, I still like the Canucks as a slight favorite, but the Hawks definitely have a chance.

[Butterscup1679666578]

Got the split we needed! Time to go to Chicago and take complete control of the series.

[Cynosure]

Got the split we needed! Time to go to Chicago and take complete control of the series.

 

Can you even imagine a semi with Detoilet? Oh good lord......

[bcl412]

Got the split we needed! Time to go to Chicago and take complete control of the series.

 

Can you even imagine a semi with Detoilet? Oh good lord......

 

Still a long way to go before that happens. Even if we win.

[Flames24Rulz]

Well this lessens the sting of the Bulls loss. Like I said before Thursday, I think the Hawks win in 6.

 

Time to come to Chicago and completely dominate these schmucks.

[Cynosure]

Got the split we needed! Time to go to Chicago and take complete control of the series.

 

Can you even imagine a semi with Detoilet? Oh good lord......

 

Still a long way to go before that happens. Even if we win.

 

Ducks won't beat Detroit.

[UMFan83]

We'll win both in Chicago. I promise you.

 

Up 3-1 going back to Vancouver? I'll take it!

[NewUserName]

Got the split we needed! Time to go to Chicago and take complete control of the series.

 

Can you even imagine a semi with Detoilet? Oh good lord......

 

 

If it happens it is quite possible that me and you get banned :)

[Outshined_One]

Got the split we needed! Time to go to Chicago and take complete control of the series.

 

Can you even imagine a semi with Detoilet? Oh good lord......

 

 

If it happens it is quite possible that me and you get banned :)

 

*Sharpens ban hammer quietly in the corner, ears perk up*

[brinoch]

2-0.

 

Not surprised in the least. Vancouver is a better team than us right now.

 

Are you even watching the game? The blackhawks were outplaying them by quite a bit before the powerplays. This thread has become unreadable with your terrible posts and cynosure.

 

 

The Blackhawks are going to appear to be outplaying Vancouver a lot, because Vancouver is content to play extremely sound defense, let Luongo make the saves and wait for the Hawks to have defensive breakdowns and penalties, which they will.

 

Hockey is subtle and hard to understand to the unknowledgable fan.

 

Awesome, a bunch of vague meaningless analysis from you as usual. You forgot to use the word textbook and the term fresh legs. Enjoy living in North Dokta =D>

 

Let's be honest, you probably never played competitive hockey and wouldn't know how to play a left wing lock (if you can skate that is). Enjoy posting in this thread all night, I'm out. Peace.

 

Wow, the old "you never played X sport so you can't comment" crap. Fail.

[Cynosure]

Got the split we needed! Time to go to Chicago and take complete control of the series.

 

Can you even imagine a semi with Detoilet? Oh good lord......

 

 

If it happens it is quite possible that me and you get banned :)

 

I'll take it, because it means your and my team advance :)

[NewUserName]

2-0.

 

Not surprised in the least. Vancouver is a better team than us right now.

 

Are you even watching the game? The blackhawks were outplaying them by quite a bit before the powerplays. This thread has become unreadable with your terrible posts and cynosure.

 

 

The Blackhawks are going to appear to be outplaying Vancouver a lot, because Vancouver is content to play extremely sound defense, let Luongo make the saves and wait for the Hawks to have defensive breakdowns and penalties, which they will.

 

Hockey is subtle and hard to understand to the unknowledgable fan.

 

Awesome, a bunch of vague meaningless analysis from you as usual. You forgot to use the word textbook and the term fresh legs. Enjoy living in North Dokta =D>

 

Let's be honest, you probably never played competitive hockey and wouldn't know how to play a left wing lock (if you can skate that is). Enjoy posting in this thread all night, I'm out. Peace.

 

Wow, the old "you never played X sport so you can't comment" crap. Fail.

 

Well the left wing lock is pretty complicated. Precursor to the dreaded trap.

[Cynosure]

User, as a Wings fan is VERY familiar ;)

 

I kid I kid.

[NewUserName]

User, as a Wings fan is VERY familiar ;)

 

I kid I kid.

 

I know, I also know that you are very passionate during games and sometimes write things that a fan of the other team may take offense to. Hope to see you in the WCF

[brinoch]

It's not that complicated to understand, though in practice it's pretty tough to play.

 

When the opposing offense has possession, the left wing (though this is not always the left winger) lines up with the defensemen, splitting the coverage zones three ways rather than two. The center and right wing forecheck into the left wing. This cuts down on odd man rushes, leads to quick turnovers and odd-man rushes.

[NewUserName]

It's not that complicated to understand, though in practice it's pretty tough to play.

 

When the opposing offense has possession, the left wing (though this is not always the left winger) lines up with the defensemen, splitting the coverage zones three ways rather than two. The center and right wing forecheck into the left wing. This cuts down on odd man rushes, leads to quick turnovers and odd-man rushes.

 

Pretty much. I think it was used in Europe against the Russians back in the 70s. The Red Wings made it famous in North America in the 90s. I guess it is pretty popular in youth hockey now. When I was younger and played I had never heard of it, of course that was in the 80s.

[Cynosure]

It's not that complicated to understand, though in practice it's pretty tough to play.

 

When the opposing offense has possession, the left wing (though this is not always the left winger) lines up with the defensemen, splitting the coverage zones three ways rather than two. The center and right wing forecheck into the left wing. This cuts down on odd man rushes, leads to quick turnovers and odd-man rushes.

 

Pretty much. I think it was used in Europe against the Russians back in the 70s. The Red Wings made it famous in North America in the 90s. I guess it is pretty popular in youth hockey now. When I was younger and played I had never heard of it, of course that was in the 80s.

 

You guys don't know as much as jaydee, so chill out.

[Hairyducked Idiot]

If you want to go with the "you never played" thing, why would you go to an Xs and Os question. Us nerds are all about the Xs and Os.

 

He should have said something like "I bet you don't even know what it's like to be in a locker room during the break between periods and know you are going to win" or something like that.

[NewUserName]

It's not that complicated to understand, though in practice it's pretty tough to play.

 

When the opposing offense has possession, the left wing (though this is not always the left winger) lines up with the defensemen, splitting the coverage zones three ways rather than two. The center and right wing forecheck into the left wing. This cuts down on odd man rushes, leads to quick turnovers and odd-man rushes.

 

Pretty much. I think it was used in Europe against the Russians back in the 70s. The Red Wings made it famous in North America in the 90s. I guess it is pretty popular in youth hockey now. When I was younger and played I had never heard of it, of course that was in the 80s.

 

You guys don't know as much as jaydee, so chill out.

 

my bad