Derek Lowe?

[Post Count Padder]

Take it with a grain of salt, but:

 

Carrie Muskat reported Derek Lowe has made it known he would be willing to sign with the Cubs.

 

 

He's still pretty decent, but I see him signing with Boston.

[SouthSideRyan]

Take it with a grain of salt, but:

 

Carrie Muskat reported Derek Lowe has made it known he would be willing to sign with the Cubs.

 

 

He's still pretty decent, but I see him signing with Boston.

 

Every FA is gonna be "willing to sign with" the Cubs, Red Sox, Yankees, Mets, Phillies, Angels, and Dodgers. They're the teams with the most money and any player in their right mind would get them into the bidding.

[nick23]

I'd take Lowe over Sabathia given how much money both will be seeking. Will Lowe and Dempster's contracts be similar? Or will Lowe be asking for more money and years?

[daske17]

I seem to remember reading someplace that Lowe is only going to be looking for a three-year deal. No discussion on how much though.

[rchap24]

I seem to remember reading someplace that Lowe is only going to be looking for a three-year deal. No discussion on how much though.

 

Sign me up with that sinker at Wrigley.

[Little Slide Rooter]

I wouldnt mind Lowe, but I think its a pretty safe bet that as far as pitchers go, is will be Peavy or Dempster, and then move on to other things.

[nick23]

I wouldnt mind Lowe, but I think its a pretty safe bet that as far as pitchers go, is will be Peavy or Dempster, and then move on to other things.

Why is that a safe bet? Why would anyone prefer Dempster over Lowe assuming the contracts would be similar?

[daske17]

I wouldnt mind Lowe, but I think its a pretty safe bet that as far as pitchers go, is will be Peavy or Dempster, and then move on to other things.

Why is that a safe bet? Why would anyone prefer Dempster over Lowe assuming the contracts would be similar?

 

I think it's a safe bet based on what we've been hearing from the Cubs organization. They're not looking to make a splash in the free agent market because of lower payroll flexibility than in years past, coupled with the fact that Hendry has made Dempster a priority.

[Blue W]

I think it's a safe bet based on what we've been hearing from the Cubs organization. They're not looking to make a splash in the free agent market because of lower payroll flexibility than in years past, coupled with the fact that Hendry has made Dempster a priority.

 

Not sure there's anything to back that statement up. Where have you heard that Dempster is a "priority" as opposed to Peavy via trade or any other FA pitcher? I would take Peavy or Lowe over Dempster any day. I don't think the Cubs are putting all of their eggs in the Dempster basket by any means. But maybe you've read or seen something I haven't. In which case, please share.

[erik316wttn]

Peavy, Harden, Z, Lowe, Lilly.....

 

Excuse me, I need to go change my pants.

[daske17]

I think it's a safe bet based on what we've been hearing from the Cubs organization. They're not looking to make a splash in the free agent market because of lower payroll flexibility than in years past, coupled with the fact that Hendry has made Dempster a priority.

 

Not sure there's anything to back that statement up. Where have you heard that Dempster is a "priority" as opposed to Peavy via trade or any other FA pitcher? I would take Peavy or Lowe over Dempster any day. I don't think the Cubs are putting all of their eggs in the Dempster basket by any means. But maybe you've read or seen something I haven't. In which case, please share.

 

I don't have the time to find all the relevant articles, but Jim Hendry has made it abundantly clear that his priorities this off-season are re-signing Dempster and Wood.

[rchap24]

I think it's a safe bet based on what we've been hearing from the Cubs organization. They're not looking to make a splash in the free agent market because of lower payroll flexibility than in years past, coupled with the fact that Hendry has made Dempster a priority.

 

Not sure there's anything to back that statement up. Where have you heard that Dempster is a "priority" as opposed to Peavy via trade or any other FA pitcher? I would take Peavy or Lowe over Dempster any day. I don't think the Cubs are putting all of their eggs in the Dempster basket by any means. But maybe you've read or seen something I haven't. In which case, please share.

 

I don't have the time to find all the relevant articles, but Jim Hendry has made it abundantly clear that his priorities this off-season are re-signing Dempster and Wood.

 

yeah, but Dempster has made it pretty clear that he plans to test the market and doesn't plan on signing anytime soon

[RedFlash]

I think it's a safe bet based on what we've been hearing from the Cubs organization. They're not looking to make a splash in the free agent market because of lower payroll flexibility than in years past, coupled with the fact that Hendry has made Dempster a priority.

 

Not sure there's anything to back that statement up. Where have you heard that Dempster is a "priority" as opposed to Peavy via trade or any other FA pitcher? I would take Peavy or Lowe over Dempster any day. I don't think the Cubs are putting all of their eggs in the Dempster basket by any means. But maybe you've read or seen something I haven't. In which case, please share.

 

I don't have the time to find all the relevant articles, but Jim Hendry has made it abundantly clear that his priorities this off-season are re-signing Dempster and Wood.

 

yeah, but Dempster has made it pretty clear that he plans to test the market and doesn't plan on signing anytime soon

 

Which means, if the Cubs do acquire Peavy it would allow them to either be patient with Dempster in free agency or allow the Cubs to thank Dempster for his contributions and move on to other priorities, which I hope they do.

[rchap24]

I think it's a safe bet based on what we've been hearing from the Cubs organization. They're not looking to make a splash in the free agent market because of lower payroll flexibility than in years past, coupled with the fact that Hendry has made Dempster a priority.

 

Not sure there's anything to back that statement up. Where have you heard that Dempster is a "priority" as opposed to Peavy via trade or any other FA pitcher? I would take Peavy or Lowe over Dempster any day. I don't think the Cubs are putting all of their eggs in the Dempster basket by any means. But maybe you've read or seen something I haven't. In which case, please share.

 

I don't have the time to find all the relevant articles, but Jim Hendry has made it abundantly clear that his priorities this off-season are re-signing Dempster and Wood.

 

yeah, but Dempster has made it pretty clear that he plans to test the market and doesn't plan on signing anytime soon

 

Which means, if the Cubs do acquire Peavy it would allow them to either be patient with Dempster in free agency or allow the Cubs to thank Dempster for his contributions and move on to other priorities, which I hope they do.

 

Agreed, but I don't think they can obtain both of them or will because of the need of the left handed bat

[RedFlash]

I think it's a safe bet based on what we've been hearing from the Cubs organization. They're not looking to make a splash in the free agent market because of lower payroll flexibility than in years past, coupled with the fact that Hendry has made Dempster a priority.

 

Not sure there's anything to back that statement up. Where have you heard that Dempster is a "priority" as opposed to Peavy via trade or any other FA pitcher? I would take Peavy or Lowe over Dempster any day. I don't think the Cubs are putting all of their eggs in the Dempster basket by any means. But maybe you've read or seen something I haven't. In which case, please share.

 

I don't have the time to find all the relevant articles, but Jim Hendry has made it abundantly clear that his priorities this off-season are re-signing Dempster and Wood.

 

yeah, but Dempster has made it pretty clear that he plans to test the market and doesn't plan on signing anytime soon

 

Which means, if the Cubs do acquire Peavy it would allow them to either be patient with Dempster in free agency or allow the Cubs to thank Dempster for his contributions and move on to other priorities, which I hope they do.

 

Agreed, but I don't think they can obtain both of them or will because of the need of the left handed bat

 

I really would like a quick resolution on Peavy, because if it drags out too long, then Cubs could lose the chance to sign Furcal (which I hope they sign) and perhaps lose Dempster (w or w/o getting Peavy) and maybe even Ibanez or Hermida. I'm hoping for a resolution before Thanksgiving, but considering the options for where the Padres can trade Peavy to, I almost something to get down long before Thanksgiving, or the Padres pull Peavy from the table.

 

Like most, if the Cubs can end November with Peavy, Furcal, Ibanez or Hermida (emphsis on Hermida being the first option)

 

I wouldn't care if the Cubs were quiet from December to Spring training.

[daske17]

yeah, but Dempster has made it pretty clear that he plans to test the market and doesn't plan on signing anytime soon

 

Right, but what is supposed to say? That he's perfectly content to take a below-market contract to stay in Chicago? That would ruin any leverage he has with the Cubs or another team.

 

I have a pretty good feeling that Dempster will be back in Chicago next year, but agree that I don't want it to limit our ability to get Peavy or a RF.

[rchap24]

yeah, but Dempster has made it pretty clear that he plans to test the market and doesn't plan on signing anytime soon

 

Right, but what is supposed to say? That he's perfectly content to take a below-market contract to stay in Chicago? That would ruin any leverage he has with the Cubs or another team.

 

I have a pretty good feeling that Dempster will be back in Chicago next year, but agree that I don't want it to limit our ability to get Peavy or a RF.

 

yeah definitely agree with you