Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted

I mentioned this in the Game Thread

 

When Wood came into the game last night, I should have been excited. I wasn't. I was creeped out.

 

His presence on the team just seemed weird. It's not his team anymore. Wood belongs on the field with Prior, Sosa and Alou.

 

It's hard to explain, but it was kind of like seeing a friend from high school after many years. You spent a lot of good times with them in the past, but now they look different, you've changed....the chemistry is gone.

 

Anyways, it was weird

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
I had the complete oppisite feeling. I enjoyed the hell out of it.

 

I think equal parts of a) him coming out of the pen, b) him being really skinny and c) me psychologically moving on from Wood/Prior for my own sanity

Old-Timey Member
Posted

The Ghosts of Cubbie past, I like it.

 

Can we get '98 Sosa back to play RF too? 8-)

 

I sort of felt it, too Derwood. I didn't pay much heed to the feeling until you mentioned it though.

 

He pitched well. Let's hope he holds together.

Posted
The Ghosts of Cubbie past, I like it.

 

Can we get '98 Sosa back to play RF too? 8-)

 

I sort of felt it, too Derwood. I didn't pay much heed to the feeling until you mentioned it though.

 

He pitched well. Let's hope he holds together.

 

yeah, don't get me wrong, I wish for nothing but the best from him and really hope he holds together a bullpen that seems to be unraveling at the moment. it was just weird. other people in the game thread felt it too

Community Moderator
Posted
I can agree with you about him being skinny not feeling right. But boy he was chucking it up there pretty good wasn't he?
Posted

http://faninterference.files.wordpress.com/2007/02/kerry_wood_studio_cubs.jpg

 

vs.

 

http://chicago.cubs.mlb.com/images/players/mugshot/ph_134268.jpg

 

i'm telling you, it's like seeing a friend who just came out of rehab or something

Posted
http://faninterference.files.wordpress.com/2007/02/kerry_wood_studio_cubs.jpg

 

vs.

 

http://chicago.cubs.mlb.com/images/players/mugshot/ph_134268.jpg

 

i'm telling you, it's like seeing a friend who just came out of rehab or something

 

Luckily his stuff/velocity etc. was the same.

 

He still had that nasty hook and slider.

Posted

I have to disagree. I was elated, and I found the inning a welcome distraction from a pretty ugly game on the Cubs part.

 

Glad he's back. It's been far too long.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Creepy? Hell no! I was cheering! It was the only thing that was good last night. He looked great and I forgot how much I missed watching him deal. There is just something about him that when he takes the bump it's instant energy. I loved it!
Posted
I never understood the supposed "need" to move on emotionally or mentally from the Wood era. He's a valuable asset and it was good to have him contribute.

 

it wasn't so much a need than it was just a natural occurrence. I simply haven't relied on Wood or Prior for 2 years

Old-Timey Member
Posted
I never understood the supposed "need" to move on emotionally or mentally from the Wood era. He's a valuable asset and it was good to have him contribute.

 

Quite logical, Mr. Spock 8-)

 

 

I think it's just the pain of seeing him fail to return over & over. People don't want to go through that again. But to hell with it, it was great to see him back. He is definitely needed.

Posted
I never understood the supposed "need" to move on emotionally or mentally from the Wood era. He's a valuable asset and it was good to have him contribute.

 

it wasn't so much a need than it was just a natural occurrence. I simply haven't relied on Wood or Prior for 2 years

 

I haven't relied on him either, but I don't see how that translates into feeling creepy when he does return.

Posted
I never understood the supposed "need" to move on emotionally or mentally from the Wood era. He's a valuable asset and it was good to have him contribute.

 

it wasn't so much a need than it was just a natural occurrence. I simply haven't relied on Wood or Prior for 2 years

 

I haven't relied on him either, but I don't see how that translates into feeling creepy when he does return.

 

just telling you what my initial reaction was. It was just weird to me

Posted
I never understood the supposed "need" to move on emotionally or mentally from the Wood era. He's a valuable asset and it was good to have him contribute.

 

I don't understand it at all. Look, I like Wood, he's a nice guy. He has pitched some great games, he was so compelling in 1998, and he almost single handedly got us our only postseason series win since 1908. But I don't understand the attachment to a guy who has 71 career wins and has made only 30 starts twice in his career. I know people are latching on to what he was, a dominating rookie with an unhittable slurve, a fireballer with a 96 MPH tailing fastball, etc. But to call any part of Kerry's career the "Wood era" would be selling short the disappointment that is/was his career.

Posted
I never understood the supposed "need" to move on emotionally or mentally from the Wood era. He's a valuable asset and it was good to have him contribute.

 

I don't understand it at all. Look, I like Wood, he's a nice guy. He has pitched some great games, he was so compelling in 1998, and he almost single handedly got us our only postseason series win since 1908. But I don't understand the attachment to a guy who has 71 career wins and has made only 30 starts twice in his career. I know people are latching on to what he was, a dominating rookie with an unhittable slurve, a fireballer with a 96 MPH tailing fastball, etc. But to call any part of Kerry's career the "Wood era" would be selling short the disappointment that is/was his career.

 

This part is totally and utterly meaningless.

 

Also, people will never forgot what he did in 2003, until we win the WS. IT was because of him that we made it that far. He's always been a classy guy willing to pitch through GOD knows how much pain for this team over and over and over again. He was anything but soft and always showed a ton of heart. Yes, I know it's baseball cliche etc. but he was a warrior when he was out on the mound, and a leader in the clubhouse.

 

That's why people are so attached to Kerry Wood. At least, that's why I am.

Posted

I think I can see where you're coming from Derwood. I don't know if I'd go so far as to call it creepy, but it was one of those moments that makes you think. It was good to see him back on the mound (he got his 1300th K last night, you know - I think only Johan Santana is younger of those with more. I may be wrong) yesterday, and I hope we can see him pitching just as well as he did again.

 

Maybe if they hadn't kept telling us he was due, then not putting him in, it would be less odd.

Posted
I never understood the supposed "need" to move on emotionally or mentally from the Wood era. He's a valuable asset and it was good to have him contribute.

 

I don't understand it at all. Look, I like Wood, he's a nice guy. He has pitched some great games, he was so compelling in 1998, and he almost single handedly got us our only postseason series win since 1908. But I don't understand the attachment to a guy who has 71 career wins and has made only 30 starts twice in his career. I know people are latching on to what he was, a dominating rookie with an unhittable slurve, a fireballer with a 96 MPH tailing fastball, etc. But to call any part of Kerry's career the "Wood era" would be selling short the disappointment that is/was his career.

 

This part is totally and utterly meaningless.

 

 

 

 

Yes it is. Kerry really should have won 20+ games 2 or 3 times. He would have if wins were actually an indicator of how well someone pitched.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
I never understood the supposed "need" to move on emotionally or mentally from the Wood era. He's a valuable asset and it was good to have him contribute.

 

I don't understand it at all. Look, I like Wood, he's a nice guy. He has pitched some great games, he was so compelling in 1998, and he almost single handedly got us our only postseason series win since 1908. But I don't understand the attachment to a guy who has 71 career wins and has made only 30 starts twice in his career. I know people are latching on to what he was, a dominating rookie with an unhittable slurve, a fireballer with a 96 MPH tailing fastball, etc. But to call any part of Kerry's career the "Wood era" would be selling short the disappointment that is/was his career.

 

What don't you understand? When he's healthy, he's one of the best pitchers in baseball. He's the type of pitcher you pay to watch. When he takes the mound, you can feel the energy. Some players have that charisma, some don't. As for having 71 career wins? What does this have anything to do with what he's meant to this org?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...