Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Big Hurt Sues Sox


Link

 

According to a suit filed in Cook County Circuit Court, Thomas -- now playing for the Oakland Athletics -- claims doctors from Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush University Medical Center determined his injury was a bruise when it really was a fractured navicular bone. Thomas was cleared to play by the doctors, according to the suit, and later broke another bone in the foot.

 

Attorney Thomas Demetrio said the doctors acted irresponsibly in treating Thomas.

 

"A fracture of the navicular bone is common in athletes, and it's something, when you're in the world of sports medicine, you're supposed to be very tuned in to it,'' Demetrio said Thursday. "And you're supposed to know that it takes an MRI or bone scan to diagnose it.''

 

I'd love to hear some of the depositions in this case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

This guy's an (expletive) idiot. We ain't paying this guy (expletive) - Williams

 

a guy is an idiot because doctors failed to provide the expected level of care, and in so doing probably cost him millions of dollars? if it turns out there is no merit, fine, he's an idiot. but if what is alleged in that article is properly plead and true, he wins. not giving an MRI is clearly outside of what an ortho at a Chicago teaching hospital would ordinarily do in providing care to a professional athelete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This guy's an (expletive) idiot. We ain't paying this guy (expletive) - Williams

 

a guy is an idiot because doctors failed to provide the expected level of care, and in so doing probably cost him millions of dollars? if it turns out there is no merit, fine, he's an idiot. but if what is alleged in that article is properly plead and true, he wins. not giving an MRI is clearly outside of what an ortho at a Chicago teaching hospital would ordinarily do in providing care to a professional athelete.

 

I think that post was a play on how Kenny Williams reacted to Frank Thomas' reaction when he wasn't retained by the White Sox. Williams was angry with what Thomas said and called him an "idiot".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This guy's an (expletive) idiot. We ain't paying this guy (expletive) - Williams

 

a guy is an idiot because doctors failed to provide the expected level of care, and in so doing probably cost him millions of dollars? if it turns out there is no merit, fine, he's an idiot. but if what is alleged in that article is properly plead and true, he wins. not giving an MRI is clearly outside of what an ortho at a Chicago teaching hospital would ordinarily do in providing care to a professional athelete.

 

I think that post was a play on how Kenny Williams reacted to Frank Thomas' reaction when he wasn't retained by the White Sox. Williams was angry with what Thomas said and called him an "idiot".

 

seemed to me his play was using Williams words in another context to express his opinion of Thomas's lawsuit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This guy's an (expletive) idiot. We ain't paying this guy (expletive) - Williams

 

a guy is an idiot because doctors failed to provide the expected level of care, and in so doing probably cost him millions of dollars? if it turns out there is no merit, fine, he's an idiot. but if what is alleged in that article is properly plead and true, he wins. not giving an MRI is clearly outside of what an ortho at a Chicago teaching hospital would ordinarily do in providing care to a professional athelete.

 

I think that post was a play on how Kenny Williams reacted to Frank Thomas' reaction when he wasn't retained by the White Sox. Williams was angry with what Thomas said and called him an "idiot".

 

seemed to me his play was using Williams words in another context to express his opinion of Thomas's lawsuit.

 

I just assumed it to be a joke. Who knows? But, I'm sure he'll clarify.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link

 

According to a suit filed in Cook County Circuit Court, Thomas -- now playing for the Oakland Athletics -- claims doctors from Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush University Medical Center determined his injury was a bruise when it really was a fractured navicular bone. Thomas was cleared to play by the doctors, according to the suit, and later broke another bone in the foot.

 

Attorney Thomas Demetrio said the doctors acted irresponsibly in treating Thomas.

 

"A fracture of the navicular bone is common in athletes, and it's something, when you're in the world of sports medicine, you're supposed to be very tuned in to it,'' Demetrio said Thursday. "And you're supposed to know that it takes an MRI or bone scan to diagnose it.''

 

I'd love to hear some of the depositions in this case.

 

Wouldn't Thomas's lawyers have to prove that playing on his misdiagnosed broken navicular bone is what lead to a second broken bone in that foot?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...