Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
No, I was thinking Vidro at 2B in Chicago.

 

NO, NO, NO.

 

If Walker gets dealt for Bradley who would you rather see at 2B? Neifi or Vidro?

 

I'm thinking Bowden would be dumb enough to take Patterson for Vidro btw.

Posted
No, I was thinking Vidro at 2B in Chicago.

 

NO, NO, NO.

 

If Walker gets dealt for Bradley who would you rather see at 2B? Neifi or Vidro?

 

I'm thinking Bowden would be dumb enough to take Patterson for Vidro btw.

 

1) I would rather have Neifi and 2) We would be dumb to give up Patterson for Vidro.

 

Vidro has a serious knee injury that may cause him to never produce again, if he is even able to play again.

Posted

1) I would rather have Neifi and 2) We would be dumb to give up Patterson for Vidro.

 

Vidro has a serious knee injury that may cause him to never produce again, if he is even able to play again.

 

I think you are going way overboard here.

 

Vidro is an enormous risk, but at least he brings along with him the chance for very good production. With Neifi you are guaranteed crap. And Neifi would always be the fallback if Vidro did indeed fail. Trading Corey for him would be a risk, but nothing close to a guaranteed failure or dumb. I would rather take the chance of getting something out there than guarantee absolute failure, which is what Neifi does.

Posted

1) I would rather have Neifi and 2) We would be dumb to give up Patterson for Vidro.

 

Vidro has a serious knee injury that may cause him to never produce again, if he is even able to play again.

 

I think you are going way overboard here.

 

Vidro is an enormous risk, but at least he brings along with him the chance for very good production. With Neifi you are guaranteed crap. And Neifi would always be the fallback if Vidro did indeed fail. Trading Corey for him would be a risk, but nothing close to a guaranteed failure or dumb. I would rather take the chance of getting something out there than guarantee absolute failure, which is what Neifi does.

 

If Vidro cannot play, which many close to him are sure of, Neifi becomes a much better option. That's not going overboard, that's being realistic. Neifi at 2B is better than playing with 8.

Posted
If Vidro cannot play, which many close to him are sure of, Neifi becomes a much better option. That's not going overboard, that's being realistic. Neifi at 2B is better than playing with 8.

 

And if you get Vidro, Neifi is still the fallback. I can't understand why you would want to guarantee failure instead of taking a chance for success with failure still as the fallback option.

Posted

Because, as JeffH just said, Vidro is owed $23 million dollars. Lot of money to pay a guy to never play again.

 

Sorry, pass, we can do better than Vidro. How about NOT trading Todd Walker?

Posted
Because, as JeffH just said, Vidro is owed $23 million dollars. Lot of money to pay a guy to never play again.

 

Sorry, pass, we can do better than Vidro. How about NOT trading Todd Walker?

 

But if Hendry is heckbent on trading Walker Vidro would be a decent choice if:

 

-Vidro is healthy

-The Nats picked up some cash

Posted
Because, as JeffH just said, Vidro is owed $23 million dollars. Lot of money to pay a guy to never play again.

 

Sorry, pass, we can do better than Vidro. How about NOT trading Todd Walker?

 

No one knows whether he's healthy or not. Vidro himself has signed up for the baseball world cup, so apparently he thinks he'll be healthy by the spring.

 

I say try to trade for him. He'll have to have a physical before the deal is accepted. Check him out in that physical to really find out the status of his knee.

 

Jerome Williams for Vidro should be enough. Nats need starting pitching.

Posted
Because, as JeffH just said, Vidro is owed $23 million dollars. Lot of money to pay a guy to never play again.

 

Sorry, pass, we can do better than Vidro. How about NOT trading Todd Walker?

 

But if Hendry is heckbent on trading Walker Vidro would be a decent choice if:

 

-Vidro is healthy

-The Nats picked up some cash

 

 

If he's healthy, I'm fine with his contact. A little under 8 mil a year is fine for his production (if healthy).

Posted
Because, as JeffH just said, Vidro is owed $23 million dollars. Lot of money to pay a guy to never play again.

 

Sorry, pass, we can do better than Vidro. How about NOT trading Todd Walker?

 

But if Hendry is heckbent on trading Walker Vidro would be a decent choice if:

 

-Vidro is healthy

-The Nats picked up some cash

 

Will MLB ownership do that? I doubt it.

Posted
How about NOT trading Todd Walker?

 

What a novel concept. Maybe we should explore that one...

You know the old saying about trades: One side has to agree not to trade someone before that player is not traded.

 

:-k

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...