Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Cubs Rumors & Notes

    Cubs Video

    We've discussed this as a remote but fascinating possibility all winter. Now that it's mid-January, those vague possibilities are taking on more definite forms. Alex Bregman and the Chicago Cubs could end up turning to one another in a moment of need as the endgame of the offseason sets in, according to 670 The Score's Bruce Levine

    The specific structure that Levine mentions is a three-year deal with opt-outs after each season, akin to the deals signed by Matt Chapman and Cody Bellinger last winter, and by Carlos Correa prior to the 2022 season. The Cubs aren't interested in a long-term Bregman commitment, Levine reported, but would be open to some version of this deal. They're just one of a handful of places where Bregman might land if he fully embraces the idea of such a contract, and there's still no guarantee that he will end up doing so, but you can start to see how this would work.

    Bregman could play second base very early in the season, with Nico Hoerner (perhaps) still recovering from his offseason forearm surgery. He and Matt Shaw would cover for Hoerner as needed, and the Cubs would also be relieved of their dependence on the risky proposition of handing the rookie Shaw a full-time gig right away. Bregman's skill set is well-rounded, and he'd fit gorgeously between Kyle Tucker and Michael Busch in the lineup. All that is easy to grasp.

    There are some complications, though. Doing this might require the team to move money from elsewhere on the roster, in order to make room for the expensive, high-ceiling pitching help they still need. Bregman is unlikely to sign for an AAV even as low as Bellinger's $26.7 million, so there would be wrinkles to smooth out even if this came to fruition. Nonetheless, it's an enticing option.

    Follow North Side Baseball For Chicago Cubs News & Analysis

    Do you approve of Cubs' ownership?

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    ToolDRT

    Posted

    I think I’m ready to become the Chicago Astros!

    • Like 1
    NorthsideAvenger

    Posted

    Well, I guess I'll need a new F5 button, tomorrow. 

    • Haha 1
    Jason Ross

    Posted

    Greenfield has some sources it would seem. Might be a busy night. Buckle up?

    Screenshot 2025-02-05 182723.png

    • Like 1
    Bertz

    Posted

    20 minutes ago, 1908_Cubs said:

    Greenfield has some sources it would seem. Might be a busy night. Buckle up?

    Screenshot 2025-02-05 182723.png

    He was really on the Paredes stuff and a few other things.  Did not seem as on several other things (Bellinger I wanna say?)

    But yeah this feels inevitable right now.  I'm just gonna focus on how well Bregman ties the lineup together and hope the specifics once I see them assauge my concerns.

    Jason Ross

    Posted

    1 minute ago, Bertz said:

    He was really on the Paredes stuff and a few other things.  Did not seem as on several other things (Bellinger I wanna say?)

    But yeah this feels inevitable right now.  I'm just gonna focus on how well Bregman ties the lineup together and hope the specifics once I see them assauge my concerns.

    Jed Hoyer rarely makes a trade I hate. So I'm hoping that we can kill two birds with one stone - we upgrade the lineup a bit and also find that SP we're hoping to get with two swift moves. No promises that it all turns out peaches, but that's my hope here. 

    • Like 2
    Randall Simon

    Posted

    23 minutes ago, 1908_Cubs said:

    Greenfield has some sources it would seem. Might be a busy night. Buckle up?

    Screenshot 2025-02-05 182723.png

    I'd rather give Shaw a few months in Iowa to make sure he's ready, then deal Nico closer to the deadline when Matt is breaking down the door. 

    Shaw has minimal at bats above AA and It's crazy to me how so many are gung ho about rolling him out there on opening day. Before the Tucker deal, no one had him making the OD roster, but since we're all worried about blocking him. I don't get it. 

    Jason Ross

    Posted

    4 minutes ago, Randall Simon said:

    I'd rather give Shaw a few months in Iowa to make sure he's ready, then deal Nico closer to the deadline when Matt is breaking down the door. 

    Shaw has minimal at bats above AA and It's crazy to me how so many are gung ho about rolling him out there on opening day. Before the Tucker deal, no one had him making the OD roster, but since we're all worried about blocking him. I don't get it. 

    It feels like the Cubs are sincerely that high on Matt Shaw. And I guess I get it - if you're high on him you probably see him like ZiPS does - a near immediate 2-2.5 fWAR type with numbers good enough that he could legitimately win a RoY. There's plenty of outcomes there, positive and negative, but you'd assume if the Cubs further move Hoerner for something that the answer to how the Cubs view Shaw is "very close to how ZiPS does" which would explain their process.

    I wouldn't mind the Cubs giving him a bit more time myself. But I also trust the Cubs internal modeling more than me.

    Post Count Padder

    Posted

    51 minutes ago, 1908_Cubs said:

    Worth pointing out...

    Screenshot 2025-02-05 181325.png

    You're killing me, Matt! 

    He does have a Bluesky account, for people on that place.

    • Like 1
    Randall Simon

    Posted

    I guess, pending what they could fetch in a Nico deal...

    King doesn't work because that'd require SD taking on more salary. Cease would work, but only save us a couple mil, and would Preller even take that deal? I doubt it. 

    What other pitcher is out there, worth while, available, cheaper than Nico, with a club willing to take the larger salary in the swap? 

    Jason Ross

    Posted

    Just now, Randall Simon said:

    I guess, pending what they could fetch in a Nico deal...

    King doesn't work because that'd require SD taking on more salary. Cease would work, but only save us a couple mil, and would Preller even take that deal? I doubt it. 

    What other pitcher is out there, worth while, available, cheaper than Nico, with a club willing to take the larger salary in the swap? 

    While I don't know if it's a 1-1 swap or anything, the Yankees are a team that:

    1. Could probably use  2b

    2. Has pitching

    3. The Cubs have recent trade history with over the last few years. More than once.

    Clarke Schmidt could be a name? 

    Outshined_One

    Posted

    1 minute ago, Randall Simon said:

    I guess, pending what they could fetch in a Nico deal...

    King doesn't work because that'd require SD taking on more salary. Cease would work, but only save us a couple mil, and would Preller even take that deal? I doubt it. 

    What other pitcher is out there, worth while, available, cheaper than Nico, with a club willing to take the larger salary in the swap? 

    Seattle has been the speculated trade destination for months. They have surplus young pitching and room in the MIF for Nico.

    JunkyardWalrus

    Posted

    What teams need a SS?

    And isn't Seattle out with signing Polanco?

    Post Count Padder

    Posted

    1 minute ago, Outshined_One said:

    Seattle has been the speculated trade destination for months. They have surplus young pitching and room in the MIF for Nico.

    But they re-upped Polanco, meaning they don't need to add an infielder.

    The Yankees are interesting. They have some intriguing guys ready to go in Cabrera and Peraza but don't seem inclined to let either take 2B/3B. Maybe Nico for Gil or Schmidt plus a prospect? Not my favorite idea but I can see the logic.

    KCCub

    Posted

    6 minutes ago, 1908_Cubs said:

    While I don't know if it's a 1-1 swap or anything, the Yankees are a team that:

    1. Could probably use  2b

    2. Has pitching

    3. The Cubs have recent trade history with over the last few years. More than once.

    Clarke Schmidt could be a name? 

    Yankees keep coming to mind for me as well. As you said, Schmidt, Gil, etc.

    Rcal10

    Posted

    2 minutes ago, Post Count Padder said:

    But they re-upped Polanco, meaning they don't need to add an infielder.

    The Yankees are interesting. They have some intriguing guys ready to go in Cabrera and Peraza but don't seem inclined to let either take 2B/3B. Maybe Nico for Gil or Schmidt plus a prospect? Not my favorite idea but I can see the logic.

    If the Cubs got Gil or Schmidt there wouldn’t be a prospect coming from the Yankees. I don’t mind Nico for Schmidt, however. I don’t want to lose Nico but a team with Bregman in the line up and Schmidt in the rotation is better than Nico and Rea.

    Rcal10

    Posted

    Just now, KCCub said:

    Yankees keep coming to mind for me as well. As you said, Schmidt, Gil, etc.

    Do the Phillies need Nico? Sanchez? Or Suarez? 

    Bertz

    Posted

    Dylan Moore is ideally a high quality utility guy, so I think if the Mariners have the desire Nico is still a fit

    I'll throw out the Red Sox and Guardians as possible fits too.

    Post Count Padder

    Posted

    1 minute ago, Rcal10 said:

    Do the Phillies need Nico? Sanchez? Or Suarez? 

    Bohm and Turner and Stott with Aidan Miller a year or two away. And Schwarber occupying a DH spot. So, unlikely.

    Rcal10

    Posted

    Just now, Bertz said:

    Dylan Moore is ideally a high quality utility guy, so I think if the Mariners have the desire Nico is still a fit

    I'll throw out the Red Sox and Guardians as possible fits too.

    But they don’t want to add payroll and Cubs can’t. And he isn’t a fit for either Kirby or Gilbert. Cubs would have to add a high end prospect. 

    Rcal10

    Posted

    Just now, Post Count Padder said:

    Bohm and Turner and Stott with Aidan Miller a year or two away. And Schwarber occupying a DH spot. So, unlikely.

    Maybe if they moved Bohm, like they appear to want to do. 🤷

    WhyCantWeWin

    Posted

    I like where this is going, load up for 2025 and worry about 2026 next year

    Post Count Padder

    Posted

    Just now, Rcal10 said:

    Maybe if they moved Bohm, like they appear to want to do. 🤷

    That's possible, though I'm not sure what they'd want (I live in Philly and also root for them, when they're not playing the Cubs). I suppose they deal him for a proper CFer but them signing Kepler complicated things there. Their rotation is solid and pen should hold up (plus you're not trading Bohm for a reliever).

    Post Count Padder

    Posted

    Another interesting point, if the Cubs get Bregman and keep Nico, do they have the best defensive team in the league? Gold Gloves at 3B, SS, 2B, LF, RF. CF is a sure-fire future GG. Busch played adequately at 1B and the catching tandem should be decent.

    • Like 1
    KCCub

    Posted

    6 minutes ago, Bertz said:

    Dylan Moore is ideally a high quality utility guy, so I think if the Mariners have the desire Nico is still a fit

    I'll throw out the Red Sox and Guardians as possible fits too.

    Red Sox could use a 2b. They do have Campbell though, who would be similar to Shaw. I just don’t understand why they won’t sign Bregman themselves instead of trying to make Arenado work. 

    JD94

    Posted

    I’ve skimmed Fangraphs and just not seeing much that makes sense for a Nico for SP trade that fits what Jed would likely want to do. I mean Cease and King are there, but it’s been explained how that just might not work out. Braves could really use an upgrade at SS, but they don’t have much pitching to offer and they likely need what they have until Strider gets back at worst. Clark Schmidt makes some sense I guess as I mentioned last night. That’s probably the one name that you can look at and say “yeah, maybe.” Seattle doesn’t appear willing to come off any of their SP. 




    Guest
    This is now closed for further comments

×
×
  • Create New...