So your entire argument is that, because Hendry hasn't signed the premeire FA of each off-season the last few years, he has no plan whatsoever? That's an extremely narrow view. How many rings do Vlad and Tejada have? Or how about the best player in baseball, A-Rod, how many does he have? No, it is not my entire arguement. He does not go after the top tier free agents and leaves glaring holes at positions year in year out. What game plan has Hendry had? Sign or trade for a closer last year? Good thing Dempster worked out or else we might have been last in the division. What kind fo job did Hendry do to improve the OF after trading Sosa when other OF help was available? Our bench looked might good last year with Macias and his .160 avg in pinch hitting situations. Then again you probably though Hollandsworth was the answer in left. What kind of game plan has he had? So do you think Hendry should get major props for getting Dempster or is he another guy who fell in the Cubs lap just like Murton? First let me say that Dempster started the year as a starting pitcher which was the opposite of what Hendry wanted. He wasn't a very good starting pitcher and was moved to the bullpen. I do give props to Hendry for acquiring Dempster but one pitcher doesn't make the bullpen. He also passed on a lot of closers the past two years. Hendry isn't all bad but he's bad enough where we haven't made the playoffs the past 2 years with a 100 mil payroll? What exactly do expect from this year? You like to criticize my views what exactly are yours? You think these moves are good enough to compete with Milwauke, Cards, Astros to get us into the playoffs? If so, you've got another thing coming. Hendry's past history proves to me he is going to have a very hard time improving this team enough for us to be contenders in 2006. I hope I'm wrong but I have a feeling I won't be.