What happens in those situations is basically a matter of luck or happenstance. The idea is to get a lot of base runners on so that some of those times when we happen to get hits, there are runners on. We're inevitably going to fail more often than not in those situations. That's a fact. For people to be complaining about not getting hits in certain cherry picked situations is missing the point, entirely. Luck? Sure, sometimes. If you hammer the ball but it goes directly towards the third baseman's glove, yes, that's bad luck. But grounding out to SS when you need a fly ball isn't bad luck. It's bad hitting. Most of the time when people fail in those situations, it isn't because they're unlucky. It's because of a bad approach. I doubt it's "most of the time". You really think that more than half of the time when a guy fails with the bases loaded, it's because he's unlucky? I sure don't. It's not about being lucky or unlucky. I'm not saying that we didn't get a hit because we were unlucky, or we got a hit because we were lucky. Hitting is extremely luck dependent. There are of factors coming into play to determine whether a hit happens or not. You honestly think that if a hitter went up there with the "correct" approach he'd have success more than half the time? Because, damn, that would be the key to unlocking the best offensive player in the history of the game. No, I don't think that. I just took issue with the first sentence of your original post, where you basically chalk everything up to luck in bases loaded situations. Or at least it came off that way.