Good article but I don't like the argument that I hear so often of "well a guy like Rabbit Maranville is in, so to keep a guy like Player X out is obscene." Just because there are weak HOF candidates already in the hall shouldn't be an excuse to put "Hall of Very Good" players in. I'm a small hall guy, so naturally that argument is flawed to me. The phrase "Hall of Very Good" drives me nuts. The sentiment that they should only be honoring the unquestionably great players is fine, but it's not like it's called the "Hall of Unquestionably Great" either.