Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Hairyducked Idiot

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    39,504
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    46

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Hairyducked Idiot

  1. You don't consider "he's an above-average DE" to be a good thing? Because I've said that multiple times in posts targeted directly at you. He's a perfectly fine player. Paying a high draft pick and FA prices for perfectly fine players is almost always a bad idea, unless you're very close and it's the last piece to put you over the top. It's inefficient resource management, and efficient resource management is how you make sure you have enough to fill all your holes, not just the one right in front of you today. Just like my disdain for PFF grades, this isn't something I ad hoc created after the trade to justify not liking it. I said in the weeks leading up to the deadline that I don't like those kinds of trades.
  2. No, because PFF grades are a block box with no way to check or re-test them in any way. They are pure pseudo-science, designed to fool people into thinking they are serious analysis because they have a decimal. I said that yesterday, I said it today, and I'll say it tomorrow. I will change that opinion if they ever produce solid evidence that their grading system is useful. I will not change that opinion based on the whims of whether they agree with me or not on any specific point. With regard to Sweat, I think he's an above-average end. The fact that you think it's "clear" that I don't think he's valuable is a testament to your poor observational skills.
  3. Kyler Gordon is a really bad corner who, if I were a team with a half-decent QB, would be my target on every key third down and red zone play if I were against the Bears and needed tow in.
  4. It sure didn't help. All that draft capital for the privelege of making him the highest-paid defensive player in the league. I don't mind extreme ineffiicency when you think you're close and are trying to win right away and are willing to accept a hit further down the road, but that's what the Mack deal was.
  5. If he wasn't available this offseason, then we live without him. Paying whatever it takes to fill holes without regard for value is *exactly* how Pace ended up where he did.
  6. I would like to point out that even when they agree with me about things like Montez Sweat being nothing special, I still place absolutely zero value on PFF grades
  7. "I like that we've been avoiding bad contracts by buying free agents." "Man, extending Sweat to the exact deal he would have gotten in free agency was such a savvy move." That's how you can tell someone is just looking to feel good about whatever the Bears do and not actually hold them to any sort of consistent standard.
  8. I suspect the angst won't be as intense next year because the team will probably be pretty good, but I don't expect Counsell to be any more willing than Ross to hand MLB playing time to every Coors@Iowa-inflated AAA slash line mid-tier prospect that fans are clamoring for.
  9. Poles didn't start making the win-now trades on his first day. He started out the same way as Pace did. Paying draft capital for the mere privilege of paying market-value cap space to Sweat is the *exact* sort of "win-now" move that tanked Pace.
  10. People who have weird emotional biases like you do tend to project those biases onto everyone else. I have literally no idea what you're talking about with regard to being quiet about sweat during games. He's been exactly who I expected him to be: An above-average but not special defensive end.
  11. I explained a specific mathematical way to show that I'm wrong. I would absolutely budge if the right sort of evidence were produced. Don't project your boomer "I believe what I like to believe regardless of evidence" tendences onto me.
  12. The Bears have been one of the worst franchises in the league for quite a few years now. The people who are constantly saying negative things about them are doing it not because we're meanieheads, but because we're astute. You're *massively* overrating Sweat, a guy whose career high in sacks before this year was 8.5, and only started racking them up this year when playing on a stacked Washington line.
  13. Gordon is a terrible corner, Brisker is a run-only safety who contributes heavily to us getting torched repeatedly by every decent QB, and Jones is a decent value but at the absolute wrong position to be trying to sneak value out of. I remember the Pace era quite vividly. He started out with a tear-down rebuild and when he was criticized, people said "it's not his fault, he was starting out in such a bad spot from his predecessor." Much like you're saying. Then when the crack started to show and he started overpaying for guys to fill those cracks, people said "look, he's getting us great players, don't worry about how much he's paying for them." Much like you are now. Trading for Sweat was the most Pace-ian thing Poles has ever done.
  14. You're basically overrating every single player poles has acquired. If you call all the good players great, all the average players good, and all the bad players adequate, it *feels* like you're being reasonable. But the resutls on the field will never match your evaluations.
  15. It's weird to me how much praise tevin Jenkins is getting lately. I don't think he's terrible, but he gets beat cleanly plenty often, especially in the second half of games.
  16. The entire game plan tonight was to grind it out and hope for the best. There's less than five teams in the Nfl you can beat with that plan and we happened to play one of them
  17. I'm significantly less worried about Carolina playing us out of a top 2 pick
  18. I've always been a believer that all wins are good wins but this one tested that belief
  19. Sure looked to me like young lost track of Sanborn because he can't see over the lines
  20. He's still a rookie. But the clock has started ticking. He needs to look better than this by early next season.
  21. I still like him long-term but I would be afraid least starting to doom boner if I were a Panthers fan
  22. Well, he was last seen getting this much protection, hopping in place forever anyway, trying to run sideways, taking an unnecessary hit and getting hurt. So probably something like that
  23. He looks mentally broken after the fourth quarter of last game
  24. I think if you spend an offseason or three fixing his mechanics, the arm could improve. But it's so bad right now. Today has been the worst he's looked and that includes his 4 to game five days ago.
  25. 75% chance it gets picked off by the safety coming in from the left on one of Bagent's arm punts
×
×
  • Create New...