Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Hairyducked Idiot

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    39,504
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    46

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Hairyducked Idiot

  1. I was just typing that Williams will need to get over his belief the he can no-sell tackles when it costs him a fumble.
  2. Really not impressed with Penix's accuracy, seen several throws that just weren't NFL caliber.
  3. I would be thoroughly unsurprised if we let him walk. We've invested two 2nd-round picks in CB
  4. What's weird is how much of it is guaranteed. That's a *ton* of guaranteed money. Gary may have gotten more overall, but only $35m was guaranteed.
  5. I'll take the under. He's never finished a season top 10 in sacks.
  6. Sweat gets a 4-year extension worth $98m, $73m gtd. Massive overpay IMO
  7. I had a *hell* of a time convincing bears fans that what pace was doing was going to lead us to a blowup around 2020. Not so much here, but in more populated bears places on the internet, "shut up we just won the division and he got us Khalil Mack.". I don't blame everything on poles, but there are some very concerning patterns emerging that could easily doom the team just as surely as pace's anti-value approach did. Poles has shown absolutely batpoop crazy positional priorities. We are "building through the draft" but we consistently undervalue the most important positions in the game. QB, LT and DE are the three most important positions in the game and through two drafts we've a pair of fifth round picks on them. But we've got endless picks for mediocre DBs. The way he's poured resources into the WR position and it still isn't that good long-term is definitely Pace-ian, as was paying a second-round pick for the privilege of overpaying a good but not great de in his decline contract. And we are *still* in QB hell. We don't have one, and until you have one, you won't have long-term sustained success. I guess we are hoping either our pick or Carolina's nets us Williams or maye, because it not we will be counting on a tier of prospect with a pretty low hit rate.
  8. I understand the impulse, but once you start talking qb3-5 in a draft, the odds you stay in QB hell goes up considerably
  9. We are gonna find a way to come out of the draft with neither maye nor Williams and then watch as at least one of them joins stroud and young as better QBs than we cycle through in our perpetual QB hell
  10. Nothing too surprising here. Chargers were fooling him a lot by disguising coverage looks, standard anti-rookie game plan. Could have easily had 4 picks. They started jumping routes a bit and he occasionally beat it (that one third down throw to Moore was so good) but not enough to stop teams from doing it. Longer throws are erratic. The one that Jones dropped was a severe underthrow. I still kinda like the potential as a long-term, long-shot project. I'm not sorry he's gonna get at least one more start to see how he responds to such a bad game.
  11. That would be an ...interesting choice. If they were 3-5 I think you could make a thin case for hoping to get lucky and beat all the bad teams and get to 9-8, but I don't see how that's even thinly feasible from here And it's especially bad because even if you think that Bagent has some upside, which I do, you should still be drafting a QB next year so there's no point in playing yourself out of drafting a good one.
  12. I don't know if we should count first snap equally when we already know this season is lost and we didn't then
  13. Moore was 25.9 when the trade was made. I would lean towards the pick on both scenarios, but the first one is at least close.
  14. Given that NFL primes are fairly short, that's not insignificant. If sweat was Moore's age with Moore's contract situation, I wouldn't dislike the trade
  15. You're comparing current age and not age at times of trade
  16. I would describe his contract as significantly below market value for a wr of his caliber. That's what you're paying for, the difference. When you're paying for the privilege of giving a guy his entire free agent contract, there's no difference.
  17. Did DJ Moore get a contract extension and I missed it?
  18. If I had a nickel for every time Ryan poles created a roster hole with absolutely terrible draft priorities, ignored that hole for an entire offseason, then overpayed to fix that hole by buying at the trade deadline when not in contention, I'd have two nickels. Which isn't a lot but it's weird that it happened twice.
  19. Maybe we should have used a high pick on edge the last two years instead of burning them in mediocre or worse WRs and DBs
  20. If Moore had been 27 with half a year of contract left, I wouldn't have wanted him either
  21. Because the NFL is a meat grinder on human bodies that tends to turn good plays into less good players faster than fans notice the players are good
  22. I am pretty much always against paying for a guy twice. Paying draft capital for the privilege of giving him his FA contract almost never turns out well.
  23. 27 years old and an fa at the end of the season. Jesus that's so bad. That's the worst thing poles has done yet
  24. A second round pick for a 27 year old. Dafuq?
×
×
  • Create New...