Alright it's past midnight. Hope everyone had fun. All wins are good wins, fields finally stepped up and did the thing with the game on the line. It'd be nice if he did it more than once a year, but I'm not gonna deny that he did it for this game.
The playcalling was, imo, what it had to be.
Let's stipulate for now that the coaching staff's primary motivation is to win as many games as they can, they're not going to call a suboptimal game plan relative to that goal just to "see what they have" in fields or whatever. If someone wants to argue they should, cool, but that's a separate argument.
Minnesota is going to blitz and blitz often. They blitz specifically so that they can take away your ability to run longer-developing passing plays. Those are simply not an option.
Normally, the best way to beat the blitz is to have your QB identify where the blitzer came from and hit a hot blitz-beating route in the area he vacated.
Justin Fields is really bad at that. And before anyone says I'm making this up to be contrary, I got receipts. Here's some quotes from his pre-draft scouting reports:
https://www.nfl.com/prospects/justin-fields/32004649-4576-9504-963d-c33127e80752
"Field vision is average in face of the blitz.
Missed open blitz beaters in the middle of the field against Indiana.
Gradual operation time prevents expedited release."
https://walterfootball.com/scoutingreport2021jfields.php
"Can get rattled by the pass rush
Can freeze when seeing the blitz
Must get better at passing in the face of the rush
Blitz recognition needs work"
So what's left? Screens and quick hits, and we ran a ton of both.
What else is there?
Bootlegs? We tried a few, I don't believe any resulted in a pass attempt. Which makes sense, because the weakness of the bootleg is that it makes it easier for the defense to cover everyone.
Max protect? Minnesota can either send more than you can block, or they can show bltiz and drop everyone and you've got a bunch of wasted blockers with no one to block and a couple of triple-covered receivers. I've seen them do both to good effect this season.
Play-action? Just gives the blitz more time to get there. We tried it once, it looked awful and we smartly gave it up.
Our non-screen dropbacks against the blitz were generally a disaster (no idea why they stopped blitzing on the final drive). Sacks and fumbles and missed throws and all manner of bad things happening.
So the coaching staff went up against a defense that is one of the best at the thing fields struggles most with, came up with a game plan to help mitigate those issues and it gave them their best chance to win. Which, you know, they did.