Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Hairyducked Idiot

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    39,504
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    46

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Hairyducked Idiot

  1. shouldn't that stadium also make a lot of hitters look worse than they are? Yes. But doesn't the difference between good teams and their opponents increase in a low-run-scoring environment? Or I am misunderremembering that?
  2. I believe a lot of their hitters will take big steps forward and that Dodger stadium will make their pitching staff look better than it is. I'd say yes, best record in the league.
  3. Loss of velocity = shoulder. Loss of control = elbow. It's not rocket science.
  4. I'm pretty excited about this deal. He seems to have a good reputation as a defensive forward, which we desperately needed for the playoffs. ETA: and he's one of the top 20 guys in the league in faceoff percentage. Win!
  5. As far as I can tell, most of the users of chicagoblackhawks.com boards fit into at least one of these two categories, and usually both: 1) Think that having season tickets makes them a special class of knowledgeable. 2) Care far less about the final score than how many fights are won.
  6. I think I might make that trade. 30 minutes of Pronger in the playoffs is huge.
  7. geovany soto (and again, to all the WBC haters, your loss)
  8. Nobody's arguing about right now. It's bringing up idiocy (Lilly best pitcher on the cubs for a 2-year period he was only present for 50% of) and arguing points that NOBODY IS ARGUING (that Hill is worthless to the Cubs now) that brings down the board.
  9. Ted Lilly was/ is much better. Do you need me to tell you why this is a stupid response, or can you work it out on your own?
  10. Chris C. Carter (the oakland one)
  11. That's factually inaccurate and you should stop digging the hole.
  12. I think its pretty clear from this quote that I wasnt happy with his performance hence the qualifier "as a pitcher." Your opinion about his pitching in 2007 is ridiculous and based on awful logic. The only reasonable explanation is that there must be something else driving it.
  13. I believe I read that I'm taking two. David Freese Brett Cecil
  14. Does anyone know if he's gonna log on eventually? He's typically a late-nighter. I just hope its not another 24-hour no-show. Just got back from 7 hours of high school basketball. I'll make the picks in the next hour or so.
  15. Gotcha, didn't realize we were that far. jason motte
  16. matt cain
  17. aubrey huff
  18. ryan ludwick
  19. Good. The enjoyment I get from watching him is worth the fraction of a percent chance he might get hurt.
  20. Not only is it stupid to dismiss "one good months and five average ones" (which puts you ahead of most major-league players anyway), I'd like to know where you were shopping for 4.40 ERA pitchers in the 2007 NL that made them average. The league average for a starter that year in the NL was 4.64.
  21. The fact that this is true doesn't make the 'one good month' argument any less asinine.
×
×
  • Create New...