I want to believe he's clean and always has been clean but I wish he would stay retired and keep quiet. "They don't have no evidence"? "They haven't been writing a book about me"? C'mon Sammy. To me, when he says things like that it just confirms the doubts about him. How? To repeatedly point out lack of evidence, and now saying things like "hey I'm not the one people are writing a book about" ... just sounds suspicious, too much denial via technicalities and red herrings. Obivously this is just a viewpoint; you don't have to agree. I'm not saying it proves he was juiced - there's a lot of circumstantial evidence that already points to that. But innocent until proven guilty: there is no clear damning evidence and I hope it stays that way. So I wish he would just shut up, stay retired and rest on his laurels on his way to Cooperstown. I had the same reaction to Sammy's "they don't have no evidence" remark. The only reason that inspired some doubt in me is that he was basically angling for not guilty rather than for innocent. Not guilty matters in court and in hearings, but in a forum that is specifically limited to the court of public opinion, it comes across as quite shady. It doesn't actually mean anything, but IMO, raising an eyebrow to the remark is a very valid reaction.