This poll ranks up there with the hottest chick polls in terms of diversity in qualified options and the weight of personal taste in the final outcome. That said, I went with Jor Morgan, simply because of how painfully obvious his personal biases show through in all his sportscasting and the level of stupidity that goes with them. That can be said for others (ie Buck, McCarver), but Morgan's just get to me more. Also, I'm going to have to stick up for Muskat here. Yea, she selects questions like that of Edward K. from Indy for her mailbag and her 'analysis' can hardly be described as such, but she's also not really in a position to provide any real insight to begin with, lest she go the way of Steve and Chip. Her job seems to me like it's at least as much about propogating optimism and enthusiasm about this team as it is providing any amount of analysis, and that's definitely not a job for anyone who cares to write about them for the way they really are. Plus, she also gets more scrutiny just for being a Cubs talking head. I'm sure there are dozens of other beat writers and local coverage types who qualify just as much as she does, we'll just never know as much about them as we do about her.