Agreed that there were cheaper options then Jones, but I doubt that Conine or Jose Cruz would have been any better and most likely a lot worse. At least Jones fits Hendry's type of player, meaning that he is still in "prime" years and can contribute in several different ways. Jones' defense is better then both of those options and I would imagine that he would out produce both of them as well. Hypothecially, if Jones had signed for 2 years, would there been as much hatred for the contract? If not, I don't see where 1 year makes or breaks it. If Jones would only accept a 3 year deal then Hendry had to go to that length. At the time the options were limited and it was either Encarncion or Jones on the FA market. Who would you rather have? I have no problem with the deal and I am excited to see Jones in RF. I will support him and Hendry until they give me a reason not to. Many here have reached that point with Hendry but I haven't yet. Until there isn't a justifiable reason for something Hendry does, I won't.