Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Stratos

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    4,094
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Stratos

  1. Me thinks they just filled the RHP high end setup role with Neris. They could probably use another LHP in the pen, but they could also be done adding to the pen on MLB deals.
  2. Not sure if this was posted. Moresi says a Bellinger deal doesn't look close with any team at the moment:
  3. Morel can be a really good hitter if he stops trying to aggressively pull every pitch 450ft down the LF line. That should help him with the sliders and slower stuff away. Canario has similar issues, they both pull off pitches significantly IMO. These young strong guys that fall in love with their power won't reach their potential if they don't change their approach.
  4. Source? That seems odd.
  5. If the offseason is a failure its Ricketts' fault. There's only so much you can do when one of your best SP and your best hitter become FA, you have a mediocre bullpen, and you only have about 50m to replace them + make the team better. There was no path to improve this team significantly this offseason compared to last year's team if they stay under the LT unless they possibly started trading away a bunch of their best prospects. Given he also signed Counsell, Hoyer's done well this offseason with the budget limits he seems to have been given from ownership.
  6. Ok so post Neris are we now in the 6th or 7th inning of our offseason?
  7. Aspirations for 88 wins
  8. They were at about 199m before the signing.. 5m buffer gives them 24m left. Just enough for Bellinger
  9. If they sign Bellinger they're right up against the LT, with about 5m in space. That's before any possible incentives, midseason trade, callups etc. If they sign Bellinger they could be done for the offseason if LT is their limit.
  10. His velocity went down by 1.3 mph and his BABIP was very low so we'll see. Don't like the gb% either. Most other metrics are really good though, like whiffs, chase, most batted ball data. Solid signing, didn't think they'd spend this much on a reliever.
  11. Yes I agree my statement was incorrect.
  12. The Dbacks had 1 more win than the Cubs and so were barely above average as a team. They made the WS by getting hot at the right time of year. The Rangers had much better hitting and SP than the Cubs last year, you're right you don't need a great pen if everyone on the team is yanking HR, but they also went out and got Aroldis Chapman. The Cubs also had 10 fewer wins than the Brewers while having a larger run differential. The Brewers played close games and locked down leads. The Cubs don't have a lot of HR or 2B power, they will play quite a few close games. Their offense last year was driven by singles, BB, and speed, we aren't going to blow out games. The Cubs are set up to have about an average rotation and bullpen again and a very similar hitting lineup as 2023. Right now we have basically the exact same pen as last year and it failed us when it counted and we need to do better. Is swapping Fulmer for Fulmer 2.0 and Boxberger for Boxberger 2.0 good enough? Doubtful. The Cubs pen through June 15 was terrible, 24th in ERA in the MLB. 3 out of 6 months having a good pen isn't good enough. Alzolay gets hurt again and we're screwed.
  13. Everyone thinks the Cubs are down on Mervis. He's a good hitting prospect, nothing has changed. But you also don't bank on a position being filled by a rookie if you plan to contend. I highly doubt the Cubs would go into 2024 with Busch as their only good option at 1B either. Busch gets the shot at 1B over Mervis because he's the more advanced prospect so he gets first crack, it's not a reflection on Mervis, it's a reflection on Busch vis a vis Mervis. But Mervis is also there in case Busch struggles or is hurt. There's lots of things the Cubs can do with Busch and Mervis. Maybe Morel can't play 3B well and heads back to DH, Busch goes to 3B, and Mervis is the 1B. We don't know. The Cubs like options and depth as they should. The Cubs really have no idea what Counsell is going to end up doing or what injuries will happen or who will perform vs struggle, they're just giving Counsell lots of solid options. We have no definitive idea who will end up at 3B, 1B, and DH and neither do the Cubs. Giving Busch a shot at 1B and using Morel/Madrigal at 3B and whomever at DH is a good starting point. Nobody last year thought Bellinger would end up at 1B and Tauchman our starting CF and Madrigal really good defensively at 3B.
  14. Famous last words.
  15. If you're average at holding leads in an era where the pen throws more innings than ever before you're probably going to be not much better than an average team, which they weren't. If you have a pen filled with very average arms your pen is most likely going to be average. If the Cubs are content with being average they are stupid. If these FA relievers aren't "a good value" for Jed and Ricketts is too cheap to pay for them then Jed needs to make a trade. Trading assets for assets is not a net loss.
  16. Agree with this post. Lots of fans seem to overreact about everything. If Cubs want LHB in the lineup Mervis can always DH. It doesn't make much sense to trade him right now. Maybe next year sure. He's still a good hitting prospect
  17. Yankees blowing smoke over Bellinger? https://www.mlb.com/yankees/news/aaron-judge-expected-to-bat-third-play-center-field-in-2024 Yanks have some solid OF prospects though.
  18. So I guess if we sign a pen FA it's some 4-5m signing like Fulmer was, or slightly better? Let's hope for a trade I guess....
  19. Well I said that's what I expect to happen, not what I wanted. But I wouldn't have a big deal putting in an opt out for an expensive longterm FA deal. If I can get 2 or 3 good seasons at the youngest ages of a FA contract and avoid the later years of a deal that's a win. Can take that money saved and just sign another player. Even if you theoretically gave them an opt out every single year it's not a big deal, especially if you get concessions from the player in terms of AAV or guaranteed length.
  20. Player opt outs I meant
  21. I feel like the guarantee will be lengthy enough like 6 years but with some opt outs. Depends how confident Belli is I guess. If I were a GM I'd like opt outs for longterm deals, it gives the players incentives to keep putting in max effort as opposed to possibly starting to coast a bit.
  22. Depends why we think they underperformed their Pythag W/L list year. Some of that is distribution luck, some of it is poor high leverage pen performance. If they get Bellinger i think they're a slightly better team on paper than OD last year.... hopefully. More depth via prospects at upper levels.
  23. Jed's choice is to wait or give Boras exactly what he wants, which is almost certainly a pretty stupid contract. Or sign a guy like Keirmeyer or Bader and just not try to get one of these Boras guys? Which do you prefer?
  24. Signing Counsell should have been sign #1 that they wanted to be more like the Brewers than the Dodgers. How much they spent over the LT during the last window with the previous core is about the most we can ever hope for with this ownership.
×
×
  • Create New...