egad, man. first of all, i never said that beasley was the better rebounder. but okay, beasley is the better rebounder. and i don't see why coleman averaging 10+ rebounds per game in college makes him a better rebounder than beasley. wouldn't coleman have to actually average more rebounds than beasley to be a better rebounder? in beasley's freshman year, he averaged more rebounds per game than coleman ever averaged in any single year at syracuse. where did i say that he didn't score? i said that he was one of the best passers to have played college basketball in the last 20 years. if you're telling me that a ton of those assists weren't going to coleman, you're lying. no, what that tells me is that coleman wasn't double and triple teamed as much as beasley was. your comparison to derrick coleman doesn't fit at all. i know you're all proud of it and that somebody complimented you on it, but besides the fact that both are black, left-handed, fairly tall, and play basketball--it's not much of a comparison. i get the feeling that the left-handed thing is the driving force behind this comparison, and it's just not a good enough reason to think that they're the same person.