Wrong. Nomar's health was becoming an issue before he became a Cub. I didn't say he had no injury issues, I said to describe his pre-Cub days as Bradley-esque in injuries was very incorrect. He had red flags, but never missed huge amounts of time (save for one year). Bradley has pretty close to always missed significant time. He got hurt every year and missed nearly an entire season. Not sure why you'd complain about calling that similar to Bradley. It doesn't make a difference because Nomar was clearly damaged goods when the Cubs got him. After his 1st season where he played only 22 games, Nomar averaged.... you know what, no. You show evidence of a significant injury history, besides just saying it exists.