Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Bertz

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    12,646
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    31

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Bertz

  1. This is one of the first times I can remember where both split squad teams were reasonably interesting instead of all of the fun players of course being on the non-televised game.
  2. Cool, shorter game. Now I get to go spend my time, money and resources doing something other than consuming the MLB product. Again. What’s the business proposition in all this? It seems like an absolute money loser and adding no new fans. If you don't think shaving 30+ minutes of dead time off of every game doesn't help MLB's positioning as an entertainment product I think you're alone on that island. :dontknow:
  3. 18 runs in 3 hours and 6 minutes. This thing is friggin amazing.
  4. 16 runs and counting and this game is still on track to end in under 3:30. Really awesome stuff
  5. My boy Yonathan with the RBI. Definitely gonna see MLB this year.
  6. I just came here to say the exact same thing
  7. I'd guess it's just those 6, but as starters Stro, Sampson, and Elias each go two?
  8. Yeah, count me in as a pitch clock fan
  9. It's possible this is true, but I personally have not heard it from anyone but bears fans I listen to a lot of sports radio. I have no idea if there's a tweet out there that said it, but Matt Miller, for one, said on the Score that he'd have Fields #1 in this draft, easily. This is the closest I can find to proof of that in under 30 seconds. I can vouch for having heard Nate Tice say it too on a podcast. (calling him an NFL scout is a stretch) Matt Miller definitely said it in writing too
  10. I'm going to be such a sucker for any positive news about Bellinger. I know it's overly reductive but it really feels like he's the key cog on the position player side. If he throws up a 120ish wRC+ it drastically changes the complexion of the lineup. Like here's a sample lineup, with everyone at their projected wRC+s plus that bump for Bellinger: LF - Happ (113) RF - Suzuki (131) SS - Swanson (108) CF - Bellinger (120) DH - Mancini (106) 1B - Hosmer (108) 3B - Wisdom (101) or Morel (99) 2B - Hoerner (104) C - Gomes (90)
  11. Depending on your perspective either a very fun or very depressing surprise at #32
  12. https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/leaderboard/arm-strength?type=player&year=2022&minThrows=100&pos=arm_2b&team= 5 guys last year had worse arms than Madrigal at 2B and also played a meaningful amount at 3rd: DJ Lemahieu Wilmer Flores Josh Harrison Brandon Drury Jon Berti Lemahieu, Harrison, and Berti played well at 3rd, Flores was okay, and Drury sucked. Expanding the sample a bit, Brendan Donavan (good at 3B) and Max Muncy (bad at 3B) throw only smidge harder than Madrigal.
  13. BA released the remainder of their top 30 today: 11. Wicks 12. Canario 13. Caissie 14. Palencia 15. Ferris 16. Ballesteros 17. Herz 18. Triantos 19. Piñango 20. Assad 21. Made 22. Hodge 23. Hill 24. Strumpf 25. Aliendo 26. Devers 27. P. Ramírez 28. Sanders 29. Franklin 30. R. Thompson
  14. It would be really nice if Kilian's issues in the second half last year could just be nestly chalked up to that knee injury.
  15. Wisdom’s low WAR last year was largely due to his defense that graded very poorly and swung pretty wildly away from his previous relatively decent grades, as defensive metrics sometimes do. I think he’s a better defensive player than what the metrics showed last year, and is probably closer to a 2 to 2.5 WAR player. He also really rushed back from that finger sprain late in the year. He had a 111 wRC+ when he went on the IL in August, and had a 54 from when he came back through the end of the year. That is one of the things I'm hoping that this year's team can avoid doing and help hit their 70th or 80th percentile outcome. Between a versatile bench and the fairly loaded Iowa club, the team can go three deep essentially everywhere. That *should* allow them to put guys right on the IL after they tweak something, and at the same time not rely on the #2 guy on the depth chart to be an ironman while the first guy's out.
  16. I wouldn't be especially shocked if Bote got back to quality bench material now that he's another offseason removed from his injury. But RHH infielder without elite defense is a pretty crowded field in this org, and the 40 man situation gives him another hurdle to overcome. Rios is probably the favorite for that last bench spot, but we shouldn't be especially shocked with anybody ending up with it.
  17. Do we think contacts/improved vision can help with throwing strikes or is this (pun intended) just eyewash?
  18. Eric mentioned a little while back that he had Davis as a 45+. That's basically where he parks guys who are a 50 or more on talent but have really elevated risk in their profiles.
  19. I don't know his exact methodology (Wicks feels way too high for being on only one list?), but still an interesting look at an aggregate of the various rankings.
  20. PCA at 14 (!!!) Alcantara at 73 Wesneski at 88 Hernandez at 100 We already knew from other notes that Caissie and Davis dropped, but not a surprise looks like Triantos did as well.
  21. I was pretty sure it was the plan already, but woo boy seeing that spending every 3rd year resetting the LT is explicitly and publicly part of the plan even in the best case scenarios is not great.
×
×
  • Create New...