Brain dumping here because last night's game sucked and then it was hot as hell in our house so I lingered on it more than I/anyone should.
We're 79 games in, and I think, though the particulars have changed a little, my opinion of the true talent level of the team as currently constructed is largely unchanged from what it was going into the season, which is that it's roughly an 88 win team. PCA found another level, but it's important to remember that the FG projections loved him (like 4.5-5 fWAR if I remember), and I think that step up is more or less offset by losing Steele. My analysis of the rest of the offense hasn't changed much based on first half performance. Horner/Suzuki/Swanson are all trending to be worth between 3 and 4 wins, Busch a shade under 3, Happ had a slow start but I still think he's the same player going forward. Carson Kelly is still Just Carson Kelly, but we were able to bank some wins off of his Barry Bonds stint, which is nice.Pitching is, minus Steele, overall the same for me too. Horton is better than I thought, but I'm downgrading Shota a little based on what we saw earlier in the year. Bullpen is
So anyways, 88 win team. Split the next two games, as an 88 win team should, and you're looking at 47-34 at the halfway point. Another 44 wins in the second half gets us to 91. Do I think that's enough to win the division? Pretty definitively yes. It requires the Cardinals and/or Brewers playing at a 93 win pace the rest of the year to overtake us, and I just don't see the talent level there for that to be a reasonable expectation. On the flip side, I think we're still a clear step behind the Dodgers, and probably not quite at the level of the Phillies. There are moves to make to get us to the Phillies level or even better, and I think we should make them, if just to solidify the division chances (the fact that both teams are right there is a little more concerning than simply a two team race). We have the money, we have the prospect capital, we have essentially our whole lineup returning next year (besides, obviously, Tucker). We should lean into this window. The Dodgers will be better, but playoff baseball is stupid and coin flippy and we should maximize our chances at appearances and ideally byes.
As for the Jed conversation...as someone who has generally been on his side, I think if he doesn't make it he probably has to go. We usually like to appeal to process over results here and I think the org is in a healthy spot. But I also think we, or at least I, tend to appeal to authority sometimes when moves are made/not made and I don't quite understand the reasoning. "Well this guy looks like he sucks, but Jed's found talent in these spots before, etc" and I think after a hypothetical three years of missing the playoffs, you almost have to do the opposite. I look at the overall decisions/process and see a (flawed) playoff team, but....you have to actually make them at some point. Three seasons of some level of 'going for it' is a large enough sample size that the process over results thing starts to lose a little authority.