Yep. The faint hope was in, "Well, we could just do it ourselves and knock six games off that lead head-to-head." So this reaction was essentially coming unless we swept all 6 games? If not today, then realistically some time next week? I love this team and wholeheartedly believe we belong in the playoffs. But I was going to need to see us get a lot closer than winning today to think we had a realistic shot at the division. Well losing today is a triple whammy of sorts, Cubs lose, Cardinals win, and one less head to head game to close the gap. That combined with blowing a late lead makes the reaction a bit more intense than if they had lost a reasonable shot by losing 3 of 4 to the Phillies or something like that. Put another way, if the Cubs had won today, all they'd have to have done is been 3 games better than the Cardinals over a 20 game span to have winning the division be entirely in their control(with that last series at Wrigley). Now the other Cardinals series isn't games 160-162 so the comparison isn't 100% true, but you can see how that seems like a reasonable hill to try to climb. Instead, now they need to be 5 games better in those 20 games, which requires a bit of a more pronounced Cubs streak or Cardinals collapse. I get what you guys are saying and I would love it to happen as much as anyone. Just seemed like a somewhat arbitrary (or incorrect) place to draw the realistic/not realistic line. Plus I'm not generally a fan of getting more upset at a loss because of the wins before it (in the regular season), which is essentially what happened here. It's just bad luck being in this division. We'll be the ones running away with it next year, and for years after that.