Jump to content
North Side Baseball

soccer10k

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    26,449
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Profiles

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Trade & Free Agent Rumors

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospect Rankings

Chicago Cubs News, Rumors & Analysis

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Chicago Cubs Fan Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by soccer10k

  1. mabry shouldn't have been punished at all. if you think of it in terms of a players contribution soccer, it makes sense. while a pitcher only pitches every fifth day, that means missing two starts as bad as a position player missing 10 games (ie they each miss about 1/16 of their playing time). I should have clarified my first point. I was only referring to Barrett, whose suspension I agree with. Mabry's I don't agree with unless Anderson gets suspended as well. But you should either suspend both Mabry and Anderson or neither of the two. But it isn't fair to only suspend one.
  2. I think the reason for it was because it didn't seem like Pierzynski wanted to fight. With other fights, like the Farnsworth-Wilson, both participents usually jaw at each other before fighting. But this is what I don't understand about MLB suspensions. They don't seem to realize that suspensions mean different things depending on whether are you a starter, reliever, or position player. A 10 game suspension for Barrett should theoretically mean 20-25 for a reliever and 50 for a starter. But it never works out that way. MLB just hands out general suspensions without factoring in the players position.
  3. I almost wish that Wood would come back healthy and pitches well for a little while so we can try to trade him before the deadline and at least get something for him.
  4. If anyone else had hit that ball, the though of a home run would have crossed my mind. But I knew it was Pierre so I knew it was going to be a harmless fly out. Let's go Ronny. Give us some insurance.
  5. Nice catch Juan Pierre. End this inning Howry.
  6. "That's ball four. YES!!" Idiot White Sox announcers.
  7. What exactly did Mariotti write about today? By the way, I find it funny that Hawk bashes him on the air. This is the only case I agree with that idiot. In a round about way he said AJ got punched because of his reputation for being a punk. It's the truth. I'm surprised this is the first time somebody has decked AJ. It's too bad Bonds didn't go after AJ like he did with Kent when they were both on the Giants. That would have been funny.
  8. JACQUE JONES!!! ALRIGHT!! Errors will kill you.
  9. starter That's what I figured. It makes sense the starter gets the loss, but I just wanted to make sure.
  10. I have a random question and a hypothetical situation. A starter leaves a game with any one run lead - let's just say 4-3 - and two runners on base. Then the reliever comes in and allows the two inherited runners to score, but nobody else and the team loses 5-4. Who gets the loss, the starter or reliever?
  11. Konerko's on steroids. That's the only explanation.
  12. Do you think the Sox walk ARam next inning?
  13. 2 HR for ARAM. He's really responding to being dropped in the order. That was pitch was lower than the first one. I don't know how he managed to hit that ball.
  14. No warnings issued Interesting. Umpires must have used common sense and realized it wasn't intentional.
  15. I think the only people that would get beaned intentionally today are Barrett and Pierzynski.
×
×
  • Create New...