soccer10k
-
Posts
26,286 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
4
Content Type
Profiles
Joomla Posts 1
Chicago Cubs Videos
Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking
News
2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
Guides & Resources
2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
The Chicago Cubs Players Project
2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker
2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses
Blogs
Events
Forums
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by soccer10k
-
:banned:
-
I'm changing my vote to Billy Packer even though he's not listed (but he should be).
-
3/12ST Cubs (Z!) @ Giants (Morris) 3:05CT CSN Chicago
soccer10k replied to otis89's topic in Fred Hornkohl Game Thread Forum
Saw Bonds' fun with the sun in left field today which was hilarious. Also saw Z's triple (and running blunder) on SportsCenter. I knew I felt an earthquake during the middle of the day. -
3/12ST Cubs (Z!) @ Giants (Morris) 3:05CT CSN Chicago
soccer10k replied to otis89's topic in Fred Hornkohl Game Thread Forum
:shock: :shock: :shock: -
i noticed this as well...what a jagbag You have never misspoke before? Be a little more critical why don't ya? sure i have...but speaking on national television isn't my job. also, i'll be as critical as i want to be...who are you? his brother? So because he's on national television he's not allowed to make any mistakes? That makes sense. of course he's allowed to make mistakes, and we're allowed to call him a rectal plunger for them criticizing people for being critical is, in itself, critical, right? so you should be less critical of people exercising their God-given right to call hubert davis a douche, because that's what he is. Criticizing him because you disagree with his opinion is one thing and is fine. Criticizing him because he made one little mistake on live television on the other hand, is quite lame.
-
i noticed this as well...what a jagbag You have never misspoke before? Be a little more critical why don't ya? sure i have...but speaking on national television isn't my job. also, i'll be as critical as i want to be...who are you? his brother? So because he's on national television he's not allowed to make any mistakes? That makes sense.
-
Ha! Drexel's head coach's name is Bruiser Flint.
-
Yeah seriously, this is ridiculous. It's live television and he misspoke. Give him a break. He meant Big Ten.
-
Arkansas really shouldn't be in the tournament.
-
Texas A&M shouldn't have lost so early in the Big 12 tourney. Too bad they don't play in the CUSA. Memphis' resume looks better. Memphis: 30-3, #8 RPI, #75 SOS, 6-3 vs Top 100 RPI, non-con RPI of 16 and non-con SOS of 22. Texas A&M: 25-6, #17 RPI, #57 SOS, 8-6 vs Top 100 RPI, non-con RPI of 35 and non-con SOS of 141. The only reason people are hating on Memphis is because they played in C-USA when it's clear that they played a tougher non-con schedule by far. They've only played 3 games against any type of competition(Houston is in the RPI top 100 but they're not good) since THANKSGIVING. They play in a crappy conference, big deal. I don't care what they've done since thanksgiving, I care what they did the whole year. And for the whole year, Memphis' resume is better, as I showed above.
-
Texas A&M shouldn't have lost so early in the Big 12 tourney. Too bad they don't play in the CUSA. Memphis' resume looks better. Memphis: 30-3, #8 RPI, #75 SOS, 6-3 vs Top 100 RPI, non-con RPI of 16 and non-con SOS of 22. Texas A&M: 25-6, #17 RPI, #57 SOS, 8-6 vs Top 100 RPI, non-con RPI of 35 and non-con SOS of 141. The only reason people are hating on Memphis is because they played in C-USA when it's clear that they played a tougher non-con schedule by far. I was just referring to your comment about the tournament. Ah, I see. Well in that case, yes it is.
-
thank you, i made a comment about this a couple of pages ago...it's kinda ridiculous. Pretty shocking to me as well looking at their resume.
-
Texas A&M shouldn't have lost so early in the Big 12 tourney. Too bad they don't play in the CUSA. Memphis' resume looks better. Memphis: 30-3, #8 RPI, #75 SOS, 6-3 vs Top 100 RPI, non-con RPI of 16 and non-con SOS of 22. Texas A&M: 25-6, #17 RPI, #57 SOS, 8-6 vs Top 100 RPI, non-con RPI of 35 and non-con SOS of 141. The only reason people are hating on Memphis is because they played in C-USA when it's clear that they played a tougher non-con schedule by far.
-
And Billy Packer is happy that the mid-majors only got 6 at large bids this year.
-
Texas A&M shouldn't have lost so early in the Big 12 tourney.
-
YES!!! Stanford is in!!!
-
Man, Creighton-Nevada in the first round.
-
How did Long Beach State manage a 12 seed? I thought they would get a 14 at best.
-
Potential Elite 8 matchup of UNC-Georgetown. Also, not looking good for Stanford right now.
-
That was my thought too. It was a great game too IIRC. Yes they did.
-
I'm gonna be ticked if Illinois gets in and Stanford doesn't.
-
Notre Dame probably deserved to be higher as well. Both Lunardi and Mandel had them as a #4.
-
Notre Dame got burned with Winthrop in the first round.
-
Wow. Old Dominion vs Butler in the first round as a 5-12 matchup.
-
Well, if you get the 2 seed with Kansas, it might be just as well if you're out there. Florida as the #1 overall just makes no sense. Yes, they dominated SEC West teams in the conference tournament, and they dominated the SEC overall, but the SEC simply wasn't that good this year. OSU should have been the #1 overall seed. Florida as the top seed is crazy. But like you said, UCLA will likely be the top #2 seed so they won't have Florida or North Carolina in their region. Also, this could mean a Florida/UNC - Georgetown region.