None. And Hill should have a pretty long leash, seeing as he's *still* the Cubs second best pitcher this season. You could easily make a case for both Lilly and Marquis being better than Hill this year. But they're all pretty close so any difference between the three is a small one. Heh, I actually have Marquis as the best starter this season so far but there's definitely a good argument for Lilly ahead of Hill now. Z still has a bit of work to go. But hey, that's just my opinion. Yeah, my bad and I agree with you. I assumed (incorrectly and stupidly) that Z was the ace. Marquis, Hill, and Lilly are the top-3 this year. I docked Marquis a bit because he's got a worse WHIP than Hill and Lilly though he does have the better ERA.