Based on what evidence can you say half the guys pitching to him were on roids? The evidence against Bonds is overwhelming (See Game of Shadows)- you're just speculating about the percentage of pitchers on roids to try to help your case. I don't know much about Game of Shadows or the circus around it. I refuse to read that or Conseco's book or any of that stuff that's hellbent simply on slamming people and profiting off the streroid buzz. But didn't the two guys who wrote it refuse to give up their sources? Meaning they could've been making all of that up? I have no doubt that Bonds was on some kind of performance enhancer at some point. He admitted to the cream and the clear in court, just as McGwire admitted using Andro. But the whole Game of Shadows thing always seemed a little fishy to me. Not that you're necessarily doing this but comparing Canseco's book to Game of Shadows is unfair to the authors of Game of Shadows. The two guys who wrote GoS worked for the SF Chronicle and started covering the BALCO when the original raid happened. The book focuses on BALCO and Victor Conte as a whole and not Bonds, though Bonds is obviously a big part of it. It also talks about Jason Giambi, Marion Jones, and other track stars. I highly, highly doubt that these guys are just making this stuff up. Like Andy, I also applaud and admire them for not revealing their sources when faced with jail time because I'm not sure I would have been able to do the same. As for the actual question, yes Bonds should be get into the HOF.