Jump to content
North Side Baseball

David

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    32,468
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by David

  1. Good point. I think Lou is a fine manager, but using W-L record probably isn't the best way to prove that. I give him credit for instilling a good approach with the team, and for appearing to be a pretty good judge of talent. For all the crowing about certain players not getting enough time, Lou has done a decent job of getting the right players into prominent roles (yes, I know someone is going to bring up Marquis or Reed Johnson or whatever). Tactically, he has issues. But every major league manager has tactical issues. We just see Lou's more frequently because we watch the Cubs every day and are more invested in their success. But I've said all this before, and no one cares. I agree completely. I'm incredibly happy with the team's offensive approach now (outside of a few qualms with stealing bases and hit and runs and crap) and I think that's at the very least partially Lou's doing. He really needs to figure out what the hell he's doing with the bullpen, though.
  2. I'm not saying that I agree with the people that say Lou is terrible, but using the Cubs record as evidence that he's not is a beyond horrible way to argue the point. You really would think Cubs fans would know better after Dusty Baker.
  3. I don't. I don't either, projections be damned.
  4. I think "many" is an overstatement. I projected them to mid-80s when their pythagorean record is 27-30, which shows I expect some improvement. But to get to 90 wins from where they are now, they'd have to play at a .581 winning percentage. Their Pyth% this season is .473, and over the past two seasons is .502. To get to .581 from that, they'd have to take a quantum leap forward. And that's just to get to 90 wins, which right now is on the very bottom end of the Cubs' likely projection. They have two young bats that make people drool, and a couple more that are above average for their position. And they have an ace pitcher who can't stay healthy. Is that enough to lead a team to 90 wins? They don't really have anything else. Their bullpen is bad. Their defense is really bad. They have a few pitching prospects, but big whoop, so does every other team in the majors. Brewers fans I read right now are basing their hopes on two things: The Cubs' turnaround last season and the fact that they lost their No. 2 pitcher and they believe we haven't lost anything. And their high point last season, June 23rd, here was the two teams' run differentials: Brewers: +29, Cubs: +22. The two teams had been almost identical, but a combination of good and bad luck had put them 8.5 games ahead of the Cubs. Luck caught up and the Cubs pulled ahead. This season, the run differentials are Cubs +92, Brewers -14. You are quickly becoming one of my favorite posters.
  5. While I'm nowhere near ready to claim the Cubs are having success with the Edmonds reclamation project, how awesome would it be to actually be the team that has the coaches that pull stuff like this off now and then? I heart Gerald Perry.
  6. Those stupid Cubs. They're so dumb, putting together the best team in baseball and winning all the time. Hendry and Lou should be fired. Demoting Pie and signing and playing Edmonds has nothing to do with the Cubs winning. But, if it makes you happy... Chances are, with Pie up here playing instead of Edmonds, they wouldn't be any better off this year anyway. Long term, on the other hand, they're obviously probably worse off. I'm not all that high on Pie but it would've been nice to see him get an extended look and a chance to struggle.
  7. http://www.suntimes.com/sports/baseball/cubs/982329,CST-SPT-cub02.article
  8. Yea. Or....sometimes you do.
  9. I'd be worried about teams within 5 games of us. When the Brewers get there, I'll care about them.
  10. What'd that d-bag say?
  11. Thread title says Marshall. I was like wtf
  12. Um, the phrase is "moo point" No, it's "moot point" http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/moot_point If this was an inside joke or something else that went over my head, forgive me. No, it's moo point. Duh. Like a cow's opinion. It doesn't matter.
  13. Imagine if we had a CF and maybe another starting pitcher.
  14. I love this terrible song. Gives me goosebumps hearing the huge crowd singing it.
  15. Yes, damn those fan RBIs today that are about to win this game.
  16. Is it me or is Lee getting a massive shaft from the umps lately with ball/strike calls? It seems he gets pitches that aren't even borderline called as strikes constantly.
  17. I heart Kobe. Go Lakers!
  18. Yes. Exactly. I suppose we could have a higher payroll if we doled out some huge contracts to Ben Gordon and Luol Deng, though. Maybe a few more huge extensions so we can get high enough to pay the luxury tax. :roll: It's not like they could be going out and signing all these big free agents. The cap won't allow it and the really good players hardly even make it to free agency anymore.
  19. I'm 0-1, so you've got me beat percentage-wise. It's all about sample size, my friend.
×
×
  • Create New...