Sure, Hedges kept his walk rate below 2 this year and throws a sinker. Beyond that they really have nothing in common. Hendricks was still better all around in the minors with a plus pitch to go with it. To me it's shoehorning in a name and selling Hendricks short, and I'm not even the biggest Hendricks fan. There's pleeeeenty of other RHs in pro ball that could work Don't do this semantical hand-wringing about the surgical accuracy of a comp, it's uninteresting and ultimately pointless because no one was aiming for that level of precision. Kyle Hendricks is great, and he succeeds in an uncommon way. Zach Hedges is not someone who is projected to succeed at the MLB level, but if he does it would be in a similar way as Hendricks, by combining elite control with an ability to prevent hard contact. Hedges also is a bit unique, there's only a handful of SP in MiLB who do those three things as well as he does(BB%, HR rate, BABIP). Hedges is ultimately unlikely to make it happen(hence the 'homeless man's' comparison), but in the absence of a better comparison that people would be as familiar with, it makes the point.