Great points. And one of the many things that pisses me off are the thousands of Mizzou fans who are ticked off yet many are the same people wanting Pinkel gone last year and the year before. Wonder why these people have been so quiet this year, huh? Good luck in Dallas. I think the "Fire Pinkel" callings were moreso after 05 than last year. The thing with Pinkel is he as grown so much as a coach since 2005. He implemented a new offensive style to use for when Daniel became the starter, he has become very good at making in-game adjustments, as opposed to 2004 and 2005 when we didn't seem to change a thing during the game, and he's become impressively more sociable, which I think is a big thing. He used to be a stone-faced, no emotion, type guy, but as he's gone through the past few years he's definitely loosened up, and I think that has helped him become a better coach. Does winning help the perception of the coach? Definitely, but you have to give the coach the opportunity to win. Is Pinkel perfect? Absolutely not. However, I think the fact that the Athletic Department stuck with him through the rough times and let him grow as a coach while bringing in more of his own recruits was the perfect way to handle the situation. Oftentimes it is very easy to call for a coach's head after two or three bad years, but for some guys it takes longer than that to settle in and become a better coach while building a program.