Ridiculous? I think Mizzou is solid, but I don't see immense talent oozing from them. Illinois' talent is very raw, but I think there is more of it. Yes, I think it's ridiculous. I think this year's Mizzou team is much more talented than this year's Illinois team. We have probably the best TE tandem in the nation, an outstanding QB, and some very solid WRs, along with (the very inconsistent -- stop dancing and hit the hole!) Tony Temple. Our offense has the potential to be in the top 10 in the nation. The defense is still a question mark, but I think the pieces are there. I'm not trying to get into a big U of I/Mizzou argument here, because U of I impressed me in a lot of aspects today and I think we were very fortunate to get out of there with the W, but I think over the course of the season, Mizzou will show they are a lot better than they showed today and U of I will struggle a bit. Maybe that'll be different in a couple of years, but I don't think it will be this year. I think it would be "ridiculous" to say Illinois is more talented than, say, USC. Missouri is a team that, IMO, will likely finish at the bottom or just out of the top 25. Needless to say, this is higher than the Illini will finish, but that's not the point. I am an Illinois fan, but I have never really had much emotional investment in football, and am not prone to homeristic assessments of Illini football. I save that stuff for the hoops team. Missouri may be more talented than Illinois. But IMO, to say the argument is ridiculous is, well, ridiculous. Semantics, I guess.