The matter apparently won't be resolved until after the playoffs. On another note, doesn't this set a bad precedent? I mean - if the court keeps going with this, they are opening the NFL up to litigation every single time a player gets suspended, right? Yeah I guess you have a point, but this was obviously a unique case. I don't think most courts are going to hold up suspensions for an illegal steroid. The worst that will come out of this is that the NFL might have a more difficult time enforcing diuretic related suspensions. I don't think there's very much unique about this case. It's still a known banned substance, diuretic or not. If the courts can overturn this, it throws their entire drug policy into question. Now the burden of knowing what is in a supplement would seem to be the league's responsibility, not the players. And that makes no sense to me. Or -- if you can find a supplement that likes to slip in "special" ingredients without putting them on the label, now guess what? You can argue you didn't know, and the league can't suspend you. And who's to say you knew, if it wasn't on the label? After all, it wasn't on StarCaps' label, and the Williams bros got off. Bad precedent.