Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Soul

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    43,621
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Soul

  1. I see no way this club does anything of note in '07. This is the worst bullpen I think I've ever seen.
  2. That's 2 ball 4's Delgado has swung at. It's only a matter of time.
  3. Here we go. Walk in the winning run. Just do it. You know you want to.
  4. LOL. Somehow the Cubs always find their way into the worst possible situation.
  5. He's not pitching around anyone. He just can't throw strikes.
  6. I feel as helpless as a mouse in a hurricane.
  7. LOL. Walks him without a fight. Ready for the great big blow?
  8. Alright that's it. Where can I put some money on a team blowing a lead during a ballgame? If I have to watch this club blow game after game, I'm gonna make some cash off it dammit.
  9. Right on cue, the bullpen blows it. I need to start making some money on this crap. It's just too predictable.
  10. I struggle with it too. But it's growing.
  11. Here comes the bullpen to blow it. But no additional runs will score, just the ones already on base. Just enough to lose, but not hurt their box score :roll:
  12. I wouldn't be either. There's no way we hold this lead. There will need to be more runs, or we will lose. Wow, that's a great attitude....I think we hold the league with one of the hottest pitchers in baseball on the mound. What do you want? It's not like we've been shutting teams down after getting a lead all year, or anything.
  13. I wouldn't be either. There's no way we hold this lead. There will need to be more runs, or we will lose.
  14. I didn't until you just said it. What's up with that? We should play 3 more against the Royals dammit! 8-)
  15. Well, not exactly Interleague schedules: Cubs: 3 vs CHW, 3 at CHW, 3 vs SEA, 3 at TEX Brewers: 3 vs MIN, 3 at MIN, 3 at TEX, 3 at DET, 3 vs KC Cardinals: 3 at DET, 3 vs LAA, 3 at KC, 3 vs KC, 3 at OAK Astros: 3 vs TEX, 3 at TEX, 3 at CHW, 3 vs OAK, 3 vs SEA, 3 at LAA Cubs: 9 vs mediocre (CHW, SEA), 3 vs bad (TEX) Brewers: 3 vs very good (DET), 6 vs mediocre (MIN), 6 vs bad (TEX, KC) Cardinals: 3 vs very good (DET), 6 vs good (LAA, OAK), 6 vs bad (KC) Astros: 6 vs good (LAA, OAK), 6 vs mediocre (CHW, SEA), 6 vs bad (TEX) Based on this, the Cardinals actually have the toughest interleague schedule with 9 games against good teams. Their schedule just appears easier because they have 6 against the worst AL team. The Cubs probably have the easiest schedule out of all the teams with no true good teams on their schedule. Note: Even though both are 2 games over .500, I classified the A's as good but the White Sox as mediocre because of each teams RS/RA differential. I don't mind classifying Oakland as good, but I still think the White Sox will finish at least a bit above .500 so I don't classify them as mediocre. The Cubs still have only 3 games against a truly bad AL team, compared with 6 for everyone else in the division. I understand the fascination with these natural rivalries, but I don't agree that KC should be St. Louis' natural rival. There's nothing there; KC hasn't been up to it since the '80s. They should be playing someone else, or rotating until they find an actual worthy rivalry.
  16. It's not a matter of getting upset with Angelo. It's more the Bears, and Angelo, being upset with Snyder for the whole dog and pony show at the meetings. Ahhhh, gotcha.
×
×
  • Create New...