dew1679666265
-
Posts
20,547 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Joomla Posts 1
Chicago Cubs Videos
Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking
News
2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
Guides & Resources
2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
The Chicago Cubs Players Project
2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker
Blogs
Events
Forums
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by dew1679666265
-
I never knew that. That's dumb too, to be honest. Touchdown Tennessee!!!
-
Not a chance Dooley's on the hot seat. He's playing against a better team and we shouldn't even be in the position we're in. UNC should have won this thing fairly easily in regulation.
-
They need to use some logic in saying what is and is not reviewable. And don't declare a game over if you're not sure it is. Technically he is correct. The game was over until the challenge was made. If no challenge, the game is over. If the game was over, a challenge couldn't have been made because the game is over. Technically the game was not over because there was still time to make the challenge.
-
I'm thought it existed in the NCAA, but like the NFL, only for certain penalties or something. Well that's dumb. Same thing for NFL, as evidenced by the DAL-ARI game. I didn't see the Dallas/Arizona game.
-
They need to use some logic in saying what is and is not reviewable. And don't declare a game over if you're not sure it is.
-
I'm thought it existed in the NCAA, but like the NFL, only for certain penalties or something. Well that's dumb.
-
UNC had half of their field goal unit on the field while the offense was trying to spike the ball. They got the play off with 1 second left, but were charged the 5-yard penalty. Refs originally said game was over because the penalty was on the offense, but then decided to review the play because there looked to be time left on the clock when UNC spiked the ball. Thanks. I'm listening on the radio and they finally explained it once they figured out what was going on. That was horribly handled.
-
How do you declare the game over and then freaking review something? If the game isn't over, don't declare it over! I don't blame Gerald Williams for flinging his helmet. This is incredible BS.
-
I'm really pissed right now.
-
This is twice we've beaten a team and they've lucked out.
-
If the penalty is on North Carolina isn't there a runoff? Or is that NFL only?
-
I'm really confused. What's going on for those watching?
-
Wow! What was North Carolina thinking running the ball there? That's crazy stuff. They better not overturn this thing.
-
That's what the radio guys were saying.
-
Huge, huge stop there. Need a play or two and we've got this thing won.
-
Where are you seeing that?
-
Just hold 'em for 5 minutes.
-
Good job by the defense holding UNC to just a field goal after a near-pick six. 10-7 in the second isn't a bad position for Tennessee.
-
I love when receivers on the team I root for manage to get wide open. Tennessee's hanging in there, but it feels like North Carolina is still kinda in control.
-
Carolina taking advantage of a freshman QB with an intereption, sounds like we got it back on a fumble, though.
-
Glad to see we can't defend Shaun Draughn. Not a good start.
-
I can't stand this argument. By this definition, there are only a handful of impact players ever worth acquiring and the odds of it happening are slim, as only 1-3 such players are actually available any given off-season. By only considering such players, a team might never doing anything. If you can upgrade your wins by 1-2 with an acquisition that doesn't cost too much in prospects over the life of the contract acquired, then you do it. Incremental growth can be a formula for success without having one of the rare under 30 MVP candidates. The bolded, I think, is the key part of his post. Incremental growth is fine, as is adding 1-2 win players instead of focusing on more elite players. However, if you're going to pay for a guy like he's a big improvement, he better be a big improvement. Garza is likely, at best, to improve us by 3 wins (that's if we get a 0 WAR from Silva, who he'd likely replace, and that's pretty unlikely) and that isn't worth paying big in prospects and paying him $5 million in an already crowded budget.
-
And the Brewers have just traded away 5 of their best prospects in two trades. Young, cheap production is going to be really hard to come by.
-
He'd be really interesting.
-
I think Tennessee's going to lose tonight, but I'm hoping the offense can keep it close enough that we have a chance in the fourth.