Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Jason Ross

North Side Contributor
  • Posts

    6,710
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    50

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Jason Ross

  1. In a bit of fun off-day content, MLB Pipeline (Major League Baseball's internal prospect ranking team) dropped an article offering a "prospect prediction" for each team. Inside the article were a few fun predictions, such as Jackson Holliday coming up mid-season to take the second base job in Baltimore at just 20 years old, and even some National League Central coming attractions such as Rhett Lowder (Cincinnati) and Termarr Johnson (Pittsburgh) knocking on the doorstep of their parent clubs. For the Cubs, their prediction consisted of not one, nor two, but three Cub prospects making their MLB debuts this year, in Pete Crow-Armstrong, Cade Horton and Matt Shaw. Not stopping there, however, they also predicted all three would be starting for the Cubs when they won their first playoff game since 2017 this October. Obviously this is just a prediction, but let's have some fun and break down whether or not this is likely, and how it would happen. For this to occur, the Cubs would need a few things to go their way; the first being that all three prospects will need to make it to MLB this season. Luckily for the prediction, there's good reason to believe all three will at least be in Iowa come June. While PCA is already there, the other two had a bit of success in 2023 at Double-A Tennessee, and are just a small step away from joining Pete. For this to all happen, all three would need to be enjoy successful campaigns in Iowa, and with prospects, it's always hard to tell if they'll hit the ground running. All three have the types of tools that could make quick work of Triple-A competition. Crow-Armstrong is a defensive wizard, Horton has a devastating one-two power fastball-slider combination, and Shaw is a unique blend of power, contact and speed. It's hard to guarantee that, but the skills are there for all three to be successful making this part of the prediction something that feels like it could happen. Not only would all three prospects need to be doing well in Iowa, there would need to be openings on the Cubs to necessitate bringing them up mid-season and letting them start. Again, lucky for all three prospects, there should be opportunities. Cody Bellinger's ability to play any outfield position and/or first base would allow him to clear space in the middle of the outfield for the speedy center fielder. The Cubs pitching staff is already seeing attrition, which has forced them to call on fellow rookie Ben Brown to go four-plus innings in just his second appearance last night. Horton will likely get a chance to fill in for some future Cubs pitching injury victim, and take over a rotation spot. For Shaw, third base will be there for the taking if Christopher Morel (who's already made four errors at the hot corner) can't get it together. On this part of the prediction, it, too, feels like something that could really happen. Lastly, the Chicago Cubs would need to be in a position at the end of the season for them to make the playoffs. Entering the season, projection systems such as PECOTA and FanGraphs's ZiPS had the Cubs as roughly an 84-win team. On the surface, that's not spectacular, but it may be just enough to win a lackluster National League Central division. Jed Hoyer was very frank earlier this spring when he said "It's our job to beat those projections". While the Central is weak, the Cubs' path to the playoffs remains somewhat tough. With the strength of teams in the West and the East, winning a Wild Card spot will be very difficult. It's likely they have to win the division. Adding high-end prospects such as the three mentioned in the Pipeline prediction, as well as potential trade candidates during the season, will help in that aspect, too. From there, as was evidenced by last season, anything can happen, so making the playoffs would give the Cubs the ability to win that elusive playoff series. So just how likely is it for the MLB Pipeline prediction that these three will not only be starting, but help the Cubs win a playoff series in October? It's not that crazy, all things considered. All three are highly-regarded prospects, will be one step away from the big leagues very soon, and will not be blocked by MLB talent. It may take a well-timed injury for them to take the starting position, but it doesn't seem out of the question they could all cement themselves into regular roles fairly immediately. It's never easy to win a division, but the Cubs are arguably the best positioned of the five teams in the Central. It feels like it's a bit less than a coin-flip to actually happen, but even considering the number of things that need to go right for their prediction to hit, it feels like a prediction grounded in reality. If the Cubs' prediction ends up coming to fruition, everyone involved is going to be quite happy about the future of the franchise. The Future 2.0, one might say, would be very bright. What do you think of the MLB Pipeline Prediction? Do you think it's likely? Let us know in the comment section below!
  2. The Rockies gave that right back. Thank you.
  3. Yeah, Almonte feels like a place holder. Whether that's for Brown, when Taillon comes back, or Palencia later...I think he's the first arm right now that doesn't look like he's going to make it. He has stuff but he's just struggling to use it right. Looks immensely hittable despite it. Hopefully it works out, but he's the early leader of "BP arm who's looked least impressive" through the first 6 games. Fingers crossed we look back at this post and laugh in two or three months, however.
  4. Oh, we didn't finish haha. It was just 10pm and we had to work the next day. It was my first Twilight experience. Awesome game. Will play again. Think I liked it more than Eclipse.
  5. I skipped baseball practice two Sundays ago to play a 12 hour game of Twilight Imperium. Totally worth it.
  6. I'm a dork. It's a 20-sided dice. Like in nerdy ass games like D&D. I...uh...I own a few.
  7. It feels like every time the ball gets hit to him that we're rolling like, a D20 and half of the numbers end in "Morel makes an error" right now.
  8. I'm playing fantasy baseball with a handful of my students; it's a good way to build rapport and have a good time at school when we're not learning about history (I teach middle school). Now, it's unfair, considering the talent gap here, but I also don't care and enjoy flexing on my boys. They let me get way with snapping up Seiya deep in the draft and Imanaga on the the last pick. Fools.
  9. Yep. Brown is clearly still a work in progress, but man, he's a pure unicorn. We're so used to "funk" being associated with guys like Imanaga, who throw like 92 mph, or "below average", we forget that guy who throw 97mph can be funky too.
  10. Suzuki is looking like the monster he was looking like at the end of last year. Absolutely blasting baseballs.
  11. Also should be noted the extreme angle of which he throws his fastball. His release point on the fastball is a one-of-one. Hitters should simply have a harder time picking up on it because it's so awkward of a position.
  12. Can't see the warning track, but can see the side-dirt down the foul lines, so I'd guess they'd be in similar status. Honestly...field looks alright!
  13. Nah, I'm wrong. I had assumed when I saw he was starting today that he had been purposefully not used the last few days. Little did I know (pun intended?) that he did throw after I had moved on last night.
  14. Oh did Little go last night? Change my opinion, assumed he hadn't when I saw he was starting as I had turned the game off to go to bed in the blowout. It's what I get for assuming.
  15. Eh, I doubt this is a one inning thing. I'd guess it's more like you said, 2-3 innings. Little has starting experience and hasn't thrown alot this year. They need a little length out of him. He won't go five, but I bet he makes at least two. EDIT: Well, I guess he pitched last night after I had moved to go to sleep like the old man I am. Yeah, he'll go one, probably.
  16. Good news. Even with the pitching depth a little taxed (Little) the Rockies are so bad. Rather we play this than not.
  17. Luke Little is a surprise. I mean, it's not going to get played...but that's a surprise. A fun one, kind of.
  18. I mean, it does. Especially when you consider he had the advantage of the pre-tacked baseball in the Southern League last year. Players hit cliffs with their skills at different levels. This isn't a rare phenomenon. Players who didn't struggle with, say, strikeouts suddenly do when they jump a level because they were playing with fire previously. That isn't to say that Brown can't improve or advance in that aspect (he seems as though he has) but once again: statistics hide issues when competition level isn't high enough. Line scouting is helpful, but it can hide issues in plain sight.
  19. Brown has had fastball command issues for a while. It's more that Triple-A hitters are better than lower levels, and the competition level has caught up than anything. His MiLB walk rates haven't reflected the command issues, but they aren't new like the number suggest, either.
  20. Can confirm, the Bluegrass Region of Kentucky, better identified as "central" Kentucky has had many things cancelled this afternoon due to the weather.
  21. Arias to the pen seems pretty logical.
  22. I made the post at an early time. I understand why you may see "off-field" issues and there's a certain connotation there but had I meant "character issues" I'd have said that. What I meant was "everything that can occur to someone off the baseball field" and meant zero speculation of what those things may (or may not) be. The restricted list is used for "unusual circumstances that may exist" per the MLB. Maybe I could have said "other non-baseball-related-issues", which would be a fair critique, but I simply meant that I'd hope it was an easy to fix situation like a visa and nothing else; with that said, it's never a good thing for someone to be on the restricted list. At the same time, I think my time on NSBB has shown that I'm not the kind of person who speculates wildly about teenagers and what their personalities may or may not be, so a bit of "benefit of the doubt" would be appreciated in the future, as well, without suggesting I'd do something like that.
×
×
  • Create New...