Woah, just because I try not to get sky high when things are going good doesn't mean I'm always a pessimist. I'm just not one of those guys that say "OMG we are for certain the best team in the NL and on June 2nd I can definitively say that we are talented enough to ensure a World Series appearance". OK, I am generally a pessimist, but I am not outright dismissing the Cubs chances in October. I am basically saying that all things equal, the playoffs are a crapshoot, and pitching is the one thing that can quantify a team's chances in October. So instead of hoping that Soriano happens to not be in one of his 2-30 spells when the playoffs arrive, I'd rather know I can count on having 2 lock down starters in October who consistently pitch to the best hitters in baseball. Look, the list of teams that have started out equally hot or more as the Cubs and flopped either before the playoffs or in the postseason is numerous. Do you know how many 100 win teams this decade have crapped out in the first round of the playoffs? It's more than a couple. The 2007 Mets, the previous years NLCS loser, and loaded with talent, started out 37-21. Sound familiar? I know these posts are going to make me seem like the board's doom and gloom guy. I really am enjoying the Cubs play, and I'm not trying to bring anyone down. They really can win the World Series this year. But I am a realist, and I know that teams like the 2002 Red Sox, who started 42-15 and didn't make the playoffs, the 1977 Cubs (47-22), the 69 Cubs, etc etc have been there before and let their fans down. I look at the Cubs starters as not good enough, and I think its essential that we pick up a front line starter to ensure we have a good October.