If the Cubs built a new park... The stadium would be much more caneverous and the upper deck of the park would likely be much farther from the field than it is now. Ballparks are simply not built with overhangs anymore, not with luxury boxes as popular as they are. This would leave the cheap seats miles from the ballpark, and the stadium would become much less noisy as it is now. Granted the effect isn't as big in baseball parks as it is in indoor arenas, but this is something we've all but lost with the modern ballpark. Wrigley still has it. Along the same point, the luxury boxes would be the number one priority for the Cubs. They would do everything possible to ensure that the luxury boxes are as spacious and luxurious as possible. The Cubs would likely find a way to incorporate Cubs traditions like the rooftops into the ballpark. However, I don't think the Cubs are trilled with the idea of rooftop owners and only receiving a portion of the revenues. They would probably find a way to "create" rooftops outside the field, and control ownership of those rooftops, making the whole idea cheesy. Meh, I could go on...I'm just completely against a new Wrigley. Sure its not the most comfortable, its cramped, its smelly, it lacks some amenities that fans in almost every other park enjoy. I hate missing 9 outs of a game everytime I want to goto the bathroom unless I'm in the bleachers. But there are certain things that Wrigley has that are impossible to duplicate with a new park. Places like Fenway and Wrigley are so rare in today's game. All other parks are giant generic monsters poking out of the cities skyline. Wrigley is unique that it fits nicely into the neighborhood. It's no different than the 7-11 across the street or the 3 story brownstone across the street. Once Wrigley and Fenway leave, we'll never get places like this back. So I am of the opinion to enjoy what we have as long as we can.