UMFan83

A base hit wins it most likely. Former Cub top prospect Casey McGehee due up. Not good.

It'd be nice if I could see this game. I went out of my way to put the 9th inning on and I get nothing for my troubles.

I don't think there are many teams that would put Theriot in there. How has his D been at 2B? I would think most teams in baseball have a 2B in their system that can hit as well as Theriot has this year with better D. Even if they don't, no one wants to pay $3 million for someone putting up Theriot's numbers. He's not a cheap young player anymore. But I haven't seen how Theriot has done since moving to 2B....I remember reading at some point that his numbers were really good defensively back in 06 when he was playing 2B primarily.

Dammit why did they take him out, he could have tied the single game strikeout record with 20 K's? He only had 94 pitches, so he could have gone like 30 more. /Dusty Baker.

I say that if our offense breaks out and we sweep the Brewers, we find some way to claim this ballpark as our own and play the rest of our home games there. The Brewers can play at Lambeau or something.

Hahaha SIT DOWN Rnny Ceen

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/larrystone/2012041911_stone06.html Hey that's our Mike Harkey. The Cubs had the 4th pick that year, the Mariners 1. If they didn't take Junior, I'm sure the 2 or 3 team would have.

I hope the Nationals get good. They immediately seem like a much more interesting team with this kid on it. It really feels weird that the eyes of the MLB world are focused in Washington.

Seriously...I want a young super phenom pitcher that doesn't breakdown after 2 years.

He's had hot stretches before. Until he puts it together for an entire season, I think his contract will prevent the Sox from getting as much value as he provides to them.

I'm sure it will be difficult as all hell, but I'm sure there is a protocol for how to figure this out seeing as how the Big East and ACC just ran through this less than a decade ago.

+200 would be dogs The Hawks are +105 for tomorrow the Flyers -115. Hawks for the series right now would be around -350 is my guess. They were -600 after game 2. -190 after game 4 I dont post here that much but I cant freakin wait til tomorrow. Something tells me a Hawks OT winner off the stick of Hossa in the 1st overtime 3-2 final Can you explain to me how the odds work? What does it mean to be -115? How is it calculated and what is the standard bet/payoff? I've never understood that. Might be a good thing because it keeps me away from the books in Vegas, but I'd like to know. It means the Flyers are favored, and that you have to bet $115 dollars, to win $100 back if the Flyers win. Conversely, the Hawks are very slight underdogs. If you bet $100 on the Hawks and they win, you win $105.

I know it looked bad, but I don't think it was him not being sure where the puck was. I think he was "sure" it was under him. Instead, it kind of trickled down the outside of his leg. Still a bad mistake on his part, but I didn't think it was quite how you portrayed it. Maybe it just felt like it was in slow motion for me at the time, but I couldn't believe no one on the Hawks could properly communicate to Niemi, even with the language barrier, that the puck is sitting wide open in the crease and to fall on it. It felt like 5 seconds it was sitting there but it was probably more like 2.

No surprise. Laviolette's games with that were stupid. I said it during the game and I still think Leighton didn't deserve to be pulled from Game 5. It was an onslaught and the only goal he could possibly be blamed for was the one Bolland got behind him, but that's a tough bounce. Not that any of it matters. Both goalies are just stand-ins who probably aren't going to do anything spectacular. EDIT: By "both goalies" I meant Niemi and whoever starts for Philly, not Leighton and Boucher. Understood. I think all 3 goaltenders that have played in this series have just been so-so. But I also think Niemi has the best chance of putting in a great game. Hopefully he does. I had that thought after I posted that. If there is anyone who is capable of standing on his head at this point, especially in a tough environment, I think it's Niemi. I don't think he will, but he's got the best chance. Haha, who would have thought back in April that if you were discussing which of the remaining 3 goalies to potentially see playing time in the Stanley Cup finals is most likely to stand on his head for a game, the answer would be Niemi. I agree with that sentiment, but he hasn't looked all that confident the last few games. In game 1, he was shaky and gave up goals, but he looked confident getting into position and covering the puck. In game 2 he looked great. In game 3 he started looking shaky IMO, started getting caught out of position, started giving up juicy rebounds. In game 5 he made a save and didn't know where the puck was and was so scared of it bouncing into the goal, that he just stood still. Turns out the puck dribbled away and was sitting there waiting to get tapped in, and it did. I realize goalies stop pucks and don't know where they go all the time, either they get caught somewhere on their body or between their knees and skates, or whatever. But the kid couldnt even move his head. Maybe I'm just being hard on him, but thats a tough goal to give up in that situation.

Some are speculating that if they add Notre Dame, that'll be it for right now. The Big Ten has always wanted this expansion to be gradual. I just don't think it's terribly realistic. Adding Notre Dame probably won't do much, if anything, to expand the footprint of the Big Ten Network. Adding Nebraska would, though. I'd be shocked if they added more than Nebraska and Missouri if Notre Dame joins, though. It might not expand the footprint of the BTN, but I'm sure adding NBC as a partner wouldn't hurt that very much. Besides, ND does have a pretty spread out fan base, its possible the BTN can expand because of that.

I like the locker room pack. I think it includes the locker room t-shirt and hat, the DVD and 2 pucks. I could care less about the pucks though. The last time a team of mine won the championship, my allowance was $10 a week so purchasing championship material was out of the question. IF THE HAWKS ARE FORTUNATE ENOUGH TO WIN ANOTHER GAME, SOMETHING THAT WILL BE VERY DIFFICULT AND MIGHT NOT HAPPEN, I won't know what to do with myself.

So will there be a signability issue with him? I read he expected to go within the first 35 picks and that he's already committed to Alabama.

Why is that? I'm sure if Ryno had to choose between the 2 jobs he'd lean towards the Cubs, but the guy wants to manage, and there are absolutely no guarantees he'd get the Cubs job. There have been rumblings that he'd be considered but who knows if they really want a rookie manager to take over instead of another experienced vet. What if the ideal candidate who is already managing becomes available in the offseason? If he thinks he has a good shot of getting the Cubs job after this season, I don't think he would take the Orioles job now. His preference is to manage here. Has he said that? I would think his preference is to manage anywhere, and there are no guarantees he would get offered a job with the Cubs. The Cubs basically humored him by letting him coach the low minors when he asked to be considered for a managerial spot in 06. He surprised people by doing well at it, but I still don't know whether the Cubs are really actually considering it. The last 3 managerial hires they've made have been older, established managers with some level of track record. If they did go a different direction, I don't necessarily see them going with Sandberg just because he was a great player for them.

Why is that? I'm sure if Ryno had to choose between the 2 jobs he'd lean towards the Cubs, but the guy wants to manage, and there are absolutely no guarantees he'd get the Cubs job. There have been rumblings that he'd be considered but who knows if they really want a rookie manager to take over instead of another experienced vet. What if the ideal candidate who is already managing becomes available in the offseason?

LOL at the legitimacy of this Bleacher Report: http://bleacherreport.com/articles/402179-the-good-the-bad-and-the-cubs-how-bryce-harper-may-end-up-wearing-blue

I trust Wilken based on the previous drafts, but he's really putting his reputation on the line with me here.

I'm watching the replay of yesterday's game on Comcast, and I noticed something about Buff. He looked really angry all game. When he scored both of his goals, he didn't smile or really celebrate at all. He had this "there, are you happy?" look to him. I wonder if he was called out before the game either by Q or his teammates, and he played with a chip on his shoulder. I mean for a player who has been know for his over the top reactions to goals previously in the playoffs, it was weird to see him not show much emotion at all after scoring huge goals in the Stanley Cup Finals.

Because I was there, I'd go with either that one or Hossa's GWG in that game. Probably Hossa's, actually. The crowd was ecstatic when Kane scored, of course, but Hossa's came right after that long and very tense four-minute penalty kill to start OT. It was an amazing atmosphere. I went absolutely crazy for that. As I said at the time, I haven't geeked out like that in years. I was a 5 year old kid for 20 seconds. If those 2 goals weren't the top, they were 2 and 3. I just picked Versteeg's goal because going into the Vancouver series, I had a bad feeling that they'd beat us. Then they demolished us on our home ice in Game 1. Then they came out and just embarrassed the Hawks in the first few minutes of game 2. The only scored 2 goals, but they could have easily had 4-5. At that point, most of us on the board were livid and thought the Hawks just flat out quit or were just not playing their best. But after that flurry, Seabrook got a quick goal that really helped calm everyone (that's a goal that should have been in my honorable mentions). And I don't know, when Versteeg scored that goal, I just had a great feeling we would win the series, which was a 180 from what I felt 2 hours prior.

Geez, the cheapest tickets on Stubhub for Game 7 are $780 for a SRO seat. Another random thing I was thinking about.... If you could for some reason choose how you wanted the last 2 games to be played, what would you choose? A) Game 6 at home, Game 7 in Philly B) Game 6 in Philly, Game 7 at home Basically the Hawks have 2 chances to win the series. The commonly used phrase is that "in a game 7, anything can happen". No doubt the Hawks would have the advantage at home, but with everyone giving everything they got, I feel like the advantage is less than another random game of the series. So you could choose to play Game 6 at home, giving you your best chance of winning on the first of your 2 chances. The risk is of course, if you lose that game you have to play game 7 in Philly. I do like having that home game as a fallback in case of losing on Wednesday, but I'd love this series to end without going to a game 7.

I'd say Byrd would be considered if he were to be 1st in the rankings of a highly regarded advanced baseball statistic. One that could measure the total value of said player by projecting how many wins this player gives a team rather than putting a replacement level player in there instead. This statistic should put him 1st at least amongst his NL OF peers that have over, lets say 100 ABs. If you can find me evidence of such statistic, I will then consider including him into this discussion.