I'd like a solid bat that can play 3B, 1B and DH or something like that. One that doesn't have to have a permanent position but is good enough to get regular ABs. Not sure who would fit that profile though.
Reading a lot of Astros takes that are ok with this because Tucker's postseason numbers are poor lol. Sure send him out of town because of a few small sample size performances
I cant believe I'm actually excited about the Cubs.
Now I'm interested to see how Jed handles the rest of the offseason. Before I didn't care because I didn't think the Cubs would actually get the elite bat they needed. But now that we've accomplished that I am very interested to see what we can do.
Figured it was worth its own thread rather than discussing in the already over Winter Meetings thread. If mods don't want it feel free to ignore and delete.
Seems decently fair. I like Paredes but he always seemed like an odd fit in Chicago given his profile. I don't feel like we're losing a ton getting rid of him. Much rather give up Cam Smith instead of Shaw given that he's much farther away. Wesneski is useful to the Cubs and still has upside but we have several arms at a similar stage that the Cubs can use the next 2-3 years so I'm not too upset about that.
Cam Smith is the only one that hurts and I guess you have to pay to play
Kyle Tucker's ranks among position players since 2021:
fWAR: 13th - 19.1
wOBA: 11th - .375
wRC+ - 9th - 145
He really only looks up to guys like Judge, Yordan, Ohtani, Soto, Trout, Harper, Freeman, Betts and Acuna.
That would tie the random reports of the Phillies suddenly being involved with the same names mentioned (Bohm and Castellanos). Would make sense if they were actually part of a 3 team trade.
There seems to be a perception amongst non-Cubs fans that the Cubs aren't trying to win right now. I posted something on the Yankees sub the other day just giving my thoughts, while not revealing I'm a Cubs fan, and got hammered about why the Cubs would even be trying for Tucker since they're not trying to win right now, and pointed out trying to trade Bellinger, Nico and Seiya as evidence. And I guess on the surface that makes sense if that is all you've seen from the Cubs this offseason. And also, Jed is clearly not trying to build a 95 win team, he wants to build a stupid 88 win team that sneaks into the playoffs so it can appear that the Cubs are miles away from contending. I just thought it was interesting that this is the perception other fanbases have of the Cubs.
49ers last 5 games:
-17 points scored in loss to Seattle
-10 points scored in loss to Green Bay
-10 points scored in loss to Buffalo
-38 points scored in win over Chicago
-6 points scored in loss to Los Angeles Rams
One of these things is not like the other. Did the Bears defense just completely give up last week or is Eberflus a defensive mastermind keeping everything together?
You're forgetting our playoff appearance in 2020. I get why though, it really doesn't feel like we made the playoffs that year and might be one of the worst playoff teams ever.
And just 1 winning season in the 12 years since we fired Lovie after a 10-6 season. I'd say the curse of Lovie but he ended up paying us back 10 fold with the Texans win in 2022.
I'm almost certain he broke something last offseason but for the life of me I can't remember what it was. He was getting heat at the time but was proven correct.
I agree but if you’re Tucker and you just saw Soto wait out his contact and get the largest deal in baseball history how eager are you to sign an extension early rather than test the open market? Maybe having security is something enticing to him but if it’s not it makes much more sense to wait it out. If that prevents him from getting traded then he gets to stay somewhere he’s comfortable and makes the playoffs every year.
I highly doubt Jed makes a Tucker trade hoping to get an extension done this offseason and is willing to take the risk of him playing 1 season in Chicago and bolting. I certainly don’t see Jed offering a contract that blows Tucker away enough to sign early. That’s just not Jed Hoyer.
I mean I definitely think he's just assuming and its not actual reporting he's heard. But honestly, it wouldnt surprise me if Jed made a trade knowing that it was fairly likely they wouldn't be able to extend him. At the end of the day, Jed is fighting for his own extension here so next year means a lot more than 2026. I'm sure they'll attempt to extend him, and potentially offer more than they're comfortable going to try to keep him, but if he gets even half of what Soto just got after a big year, I don't know if the Cubs would go that high.
lol Jesse says that in his mind they are trading for Tucker for 1 season only and would be very unlikely to extend him. Deal makes sense because he's cheap next year and gives them flexibility when he leaves.