Jump to content
North Side Baseball

UMFan83

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    94,552
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    67

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by UMFan83

  1. That's awesome but sucks Addy isn't going to get any RBIs for that. edit: NM he gets 1 RBI duh
  2. One of the problems? That is THE single biggest problem he has. If he didn't have that issue he'd still be subpar but wouldn't be a constant point of discussion.
  3. Did the Padres change pitchers after the 1st inning or something? This dude is likely to pitch into the 6th inning for the first time in his 8 starts...not something you'd expect when he gave up 3 runs before recording his first out today.
  4. Laugh all you want but I'm assuming at least Guaranteed Rate is a business that operates in the Chicago area unlike US Cellular.
  5. Apparently the Cell is going to be called "Guaranteed Rate Field" next season. Wow edit: NM just saw the thread on this
  6. Kyle is 0 for 4 at getting the leadoff man out
  7. damn, could have used that run. quick efficient inning Kyle
  8. Damn I thought Heyward got that. OK you are hitting the ball harder and in the air, now just need a lower launch angle.
  9. It is a different park in day games. Something about the marine layer creeping in around 4pm correct?
  10. Another shitty thing about Kyle's start is that 52 pitches through 3 makes it more likely we need 3+ innings from the pen today
  11. After dominating the Rockies at Coors
  12. 8 hits today, 6 of them for extra bases including 3 triples
  13. it seems like Kyle does not have his best stuff today. Might be a dogfight to get this W for once
  14. Leadoff home run next inning i guess?
  15. Well this [expletive] is settling in
  16. horsefeathering Schimpf trying to hurt Hendrick's sparkling ERA
  17. Reasonably. For anyone else I wouldn't think twice about it being positive or negative either way. But it was fairly well struck, traveled half the distance to the OF and was opposite field. Not bad.
  18. The ball kind of carried a bit, I think he held up to make sure it wasnt caught
  19. Double, Double, Triple Good start :)
  20. I've heard a few positive bits. Not on individual players, which is probably whats important, but after killing the Bears for the performance against Denver and the first day of the co-practices with New England, the beat guys went out of their way to point out that the Bears "won" day 2 and maybe day 3. After the actual game, most of the reaction was how well the 1st team played against the Pats with the cavet that we don't know how good the Pats backup QB is (although good enough to torch the Bears 2nd team defense) But you are definitely right, more negative than positive and there really hasn't been anything compelling about this team. There does seem to be a lot of guys banged up as well. All that said, although my initial optimism for the season has dampened with how training camp has gone, I'm not letting anything that I see/hear before week 1 influence me too much. I still think Pace projected this as another rebuilding year, but one that with an easier schedule and some luck could be a playoff team (although you can probably say that about like 28 teams).
  21. Clemens has made 7 starts this year, in those 7 starts he hasn't lasted more than 5 innings in any of them (actually in 6 of the starts he pitched exactly 5 inning, and in the other one he went 4.1 IP) He faced the Cubs back in June with the Marlins and went 5 IP giving up 4 runs on 4 hits and 5 BB. Addy homered off of him but Lackey was a little bitch that day and got lit up and the Cubs lost.
  22. Is there another free site besides FanGraphs that has team stats like BB% and Contact %? There was a question asked by someone in a FG chat asking how teams with high BB% and low Contact % perform against better pitching in the postseason, and I was trying to put that together on my own but they don't have splits for only postseason statistics (that I can see). FWIW I used a BB% over 9% and Contact % under 79% as my parameters. The Cubs (10.4% and 76.8%) would be outliers in both but there are really no teams over the last 8 years that have a walk rate that high with a contact level that low that make the playoffs. If anyone cares, the teams that qualify for this are: 2015 Cubs (9.1%, 74.7%) 2015 Dodgers (9.2%, 78.0%) 2013 Reds (9.3%, 78.1%) 2012 Braves (9.3%, 78.0%) 2010 Rays (10.7%, 78.7%) 2009 Rockies (10.6%, 78.5%)
  23. Dave Cameron answered a question about the NL Cy Young race in a chat today. One person's perspective but its from an actual voter to take it FWIW.
  24. it was explained to me yesterday that the difference between living in California and living in North Dakota is a lot less time to spend on a message board because there is actually stuff to do in CA.
×
×
  • Create New...