How does signing Pedro - without giving up prospects - hurt our future? Marshall is already in the pen and Wells is unlikely to be a mainstay in the rotation anyway. we have no use for pedro right now (i personally think both wells and marshall would be better than pedro), unless we are going to trade marshall or wells for a crap 3rd baseman who will play for a month and then not be heard from again. And i think it is fairly obvious at this point that a marginal upgrade at third for a month will have no impact on whether we make the playoffs or not. How is that mortgaging our future though? If Marshall is traded I can understand, but Wells? The best idea is probably to trade him now while his value is at it's highest. Also, adding a second baseman who can hit better than Fontenot has and, perhaps, who can play some third as well would help us throughout the year and not just for the next month. Plus, Aramis will still need numerous days off most likely, to let his shoulder rest. There will be uses for whoever we might acquire. The question of how effective Pedro might be is legit, however. It's encouraging that his stuff seems to be good, though. the roster is in a real pickle as it currently stands...however...adding pedro would be very wise it would free up marshall and wells marshall...well...he is decent...but i don't think he is this future piece everyone refers to him as... well...sonnanstine is who he reminds me of...trade him now while his value is most likely at its pinnacle... i think it would be a curious and smart move to land a short stop instead of this stop gap thirdbaseman that keeps being brought up on these boards... if hendry gets pedro...i would bet money that he would then pursue a short stop or an outfielder...i don't see a stop gap thirdbaseman